'bout tree fiddy
Goddammit, Loch Ness Monster, I ain’t gonna give you no tree fiddy
Is there a way to see this as four? I’m assuming so but legitimately can’t see anything other than three. Is that the joke and I’m overthinking‽ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
The original used XI where it was 9 or 11 depending on the side.
edit: Nope I was wrong. That post links this one, lol.
I can think of a few ways, but considering where this is posted, there’s no need to overthink. Just keep it simple.
The original is one of those MC Escher type things where all the lines are connected and it actually does have four “ends” on one side
It’s an impossible object optical illusion but edited to be possible
It’s a riff on an old meme.
No, one! Lol
I am very pluralistic so I’m ok with many numbers, except one, the singular is where I draw the line!
What about 1+(n/∞) where n is a finite integer
Thank you. I’ve seen the old one before and I knew there was an illusion but I obviously couldn’t find it in the OP.
my favorite thing is when a comic has a very clear message but it’s also written at the top what it’s about and whay i should take from the message is further explained below.
alternative interpretation: it’s only possible to be neither right nor wrong on when the object is physically impossible
I agree with you on that.
But alternatively: humans can only see a portion of the whole reality of a given situation, and that specific angle can often be misleading.
Is it though?
Big if true
Typical. Both sides think theirs is the only correct answer, and that the other side is just wrong.
But in this case, the other side is wrong!
Do you even hear yourself? You sound just like them. /s
Maybe you’re right and the truth is in the middle. Next time, someone will claim there are only two, I will say there are six, so we land at four, the true truth
Maybe you’re right and the truth is in the middle
The rectangles sure are. They have an untrustworthy look to them, though…
Got it, helping satanic anarchistic sex cult rise to rival Maga republicans
It might be.
It could possibly go either way.
I’ll never lose another argument with this up my sleeve
There are four lights!
I see 37
In a row??
I fucking knew these comments would get political, they always do
Everything social is political, because politics are the mechanics of society. A non political conversation is impossible.
Welcome to Lemmy
Goddamn cardies…
This thread is basically what modern politics feels like
Too real.
18
At least there are no centrists in here claiming it’s 3.5
Or that we should agree on “throur”
Six
I guess it’s all a matter of cultural conditioning but growing up in Scandinavia this kind of rhetoric was always associated with right-wingers and other liberals whereas “both sides” was more common for progressives and leftists. The most common I saw was the one-persons-terrorist-is-another-persons-freedom-fighter.
It’s always been complicated, Chomsky famously got criticized around the world for opposing censorship of different perspectives. Censorship has always come from collectivist ideologies though.
There’s 3 lights
Sure it’s a matter of perspective, but only so far because reality will constraint that the number of items on the ground are either three or four. One of these people is closer to what’s real.
