• expatriado@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    correct, just commening the 100/80 intersection looks like 90/90, i think it was intentionally misleading, classic trying to get you problem

    • Worx@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      What a bunch of bullshit. Just draw it way off 90 if you don’t want people to use a protractor. I calculated 125° because of this (but I’m happy I still got the right wrong answer, if that makes sense)

        • jdeath@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          this is a meme tho. i wanted to treat it like a “real life” problem where if i saw those obviously 90 degree corners, i would just say it’s 90 because nowhere else in all my life outside of stupid schoolwork trick questions would that happen. which meant i got to the answer in a few seconds, which is a handy skill in real life.

          • Glemek@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            You could potentially run into this or something very similar in cad when your sketches aren’t fully defined yet. I’ve definitely ran into models that are slightly off square because someone missed a constraint much earlier in the timeline.

    • SendMePhotos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yes I originally thought 90 but then noticed the absence of a right angle sign. Also 60+40=100 which means the last angle should be 80. Making that perpendicular 100/80