Discord is banned in Turkiye. The reason is some data theft, blackmail, AI montage photos, etc. As usual, our government made the easiest and most illogical move :)

I am looking for an alternative platform to talk and chat with my friends. Which platforms do you recommend?

The ones I tried:

  • Revolt: Voice chat is not stable. They do not accept new registrations.
  • Matrix: Unstable overall.
  • TeamSpeak: ancient interface. We can still try it.
  • XMPP: It has an old interface like TS. Not sure if it has voice channels.
  • Your recommendations?
  • naticus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I use it on mobile and desktop regularly without sync issues. Has it always had that problem for you? I generally always get messages at the exact same time without fail.

    • Rolling Resistance@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I don’t have it on desktop anymore, but if I install it now, the desktop app won’t have any conversations that I have on my phone. I use a Matrix bridge instead that doesn’t forget messages.

      • naticus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Correct, it will only have all future messages. Nothing historic. But it should sync literally everything going forward.

        • Rolling Resistance@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Well, I don’t like this. The idea of sacrificing messaging history in favour of illusory security gains doesn’t sit well with me. Same goes for Signal backups.

          • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            It’s not “security” gains, it’s privacy gains, and not storing messages in a central location is a privacy feature, not a bug.

            That said, it’s not for everyone, and I respect that. That said, I don’t use Signal for things that need to stick around long-term, it’s just an SMS replacement for me, and messages are only relevant for a week, at most.

            • Rolling Resistance@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              Whatever, I mean 3rd party access to messages, which includes both security and privacy.

              Have you ever heard of Viber? Even though their chats are E2EE, there’s an option to sync them from mobile to desktop, and it was available for more than a decade. Messages are not stored in a central location.

              Signal just isn’t good enough for anything serious. It’s a rather simple and not a very convenient app, that is getting too much attention from privacy enthusiasts.

              • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 month ago

                There’s no technical reason why they couldn’t sync messages, but there is an attack if they do. Basically, someone could set up a new device with your account and grab all of your past messages. Since Signal doesn’t sync messages, they’ll only get messages going forward.

                It should certainly be an option to sync, but I don’t think it should be on by default (or at least it should ask on setup).