Sjmarf@sh.itjust.works to People Twitter@sh.itjust.works · 2 months agoThe value of xsh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square128fedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down10
arrow-up10arrow-down1imageThe value of xsh.itjust.worksSjmarf@sh.itjust.works to People Twitter@sh.itjust.works · 2 months agomessage-square128fedilink
minus-squareSiethron@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·2 months ago135, that’s not a 90 degree angle in the problem. Just visually.
minus-squareSaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up0·2 months agoOh that’s just a cheap trick. You are right, it’s 80 degrees despite looking like 90 degrees.
minus-squareLifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·edit-22 months agoNah, the imagery tricks you. 180 degrees to a line. 180 degrees inside a triangle. So you can gather the inside unlabeled angle on the triangle on the left is only 80 degrees: (180-[60+40]) So you then know it’s 100 on the right side of that +35 leaves you with 45 degrees left for the top of the right one. 180-45=. 135 degrees
minus-squaretetris11@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up0·2 months agoAlso if you add up all visible angles you get 135, so I’m sold on that alone. No no no, I won’t hear any rebuttals.
I think 125
135, that’s not a 90 degree angle in the problem. Just visually.
Oh that’s just a cheap trick. You are right, it’s 80 degrees despite looking like 90 degrees.
Nah, the imagery tricks you. 180 degrees to a line. 180 degrees inside a triangle.
So you can gather the inside unlabeled angle on the triangle on the left is only 80 degrees: (180-[60+40])
So you then know it’s 100 on the right side of that +35 leaves you with 45 degrees left for the top of the right one.
180-45=. 135 degrees
Also if you add up all visible angles you get 135, so I’m sold on that alone. No no no, I won’t hear any rebuttals.