• bob_lemon@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 days ago

      Cars being online has some tangible benefits in that they can transmit location data to emergency services, especially if the driver is unresponsive. Might save someone from dying in a ditch in the middle of nowhere.

      Arguably, some of the data collected while driving is also very useful for maintenance and development (e.g. if a lot of vehicles start having a similar issue after X miles).

      That said, this data should be limited in scope and use (e.g. must not be sold, especially not to insurance companies), as well as anonymized as much as possible. Which is currently not the case, and that definitely needs regulation.

      • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 days ago

        That said, this data should be limited in scope and use…

        Yep, anonymized, limited, non-distributable, and secured, with severe penalties (on the order of tens of thousands of dollars per person, paid to the harmed party) for failure to adhere.

      • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        10 days ago

        You don’t need a high bandwidth connection to do emergency notifications, and considering it might be in a remote area satellite would be better than LTE.

        For the diagnostics you could log events internally and then collect them with OBD-II readers, though I’d like to force car makers to use open data formats so people can see for themselves what’s collected.

      • doingthestuff@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 days ago

        Civilians used to own canons. For blowing up ships. And the occasional home invader. Doesn’t matter if it has sailed if we sink it. We should sink that ship.

    • xthexder@l.sw0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 days ago

      It’s also slightly confusing because CTV is a major TV station in Canada. I’ve never heard CTV to mean Connected TV.

      • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 days ago

        I’m not even Canadian and the CTV television station is what came to mind. Have also never heard “CTV” to mean connected TV.

  • blackluster117@possumpat.io
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    Article about technology being used against people

    Posted by ZeroCool, known hacker extraordinare

    Wake up, sheeple!

  • Beko Pharm@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    The situation is really bad for consumers. Even with a Pi-Hole and a dumb TV and something like a Fire TV stick (they tend to send lots of telemetry too and apps like Toggo will nag you to oblivion to consent to data mining - if an app asks at all that is).

    I’m slowly building up a Jellyfin library and yeah I jumped the hoops to find a non-smart TV. Wrote about it at https://beko.famkos.net/2022/11/27/on-non-smart-tvs/ and settled with a https://www.homex.eu/u55nt1000.html that ticked all my boxes:

    cheap affordable ☑ 4k (UHD) ☑ dumb non-Smart ☑ HDMI ☑ 55″

    No idea about it’s tuner though[1] alas it’s not really any longer available in any market space today and I hope it will not die on us any time soon or the quest to find a new one starts again 🤓

    [1] We’ve a decent external receiver that does all the work and HDMI juggling but even that thing is on the WiFi for software updates and in-house streaming but from what I can tell it behaves at least, which is probably just because it’s old by now.

  • ohwhatfollyisman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    this article is a load of bollocks;

    i really love my smart idiot box!

    but wait, this may sound bad,

    we interrupt this limerick for an ad –

    have you thought of switching to our socks?

    • pirat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      9 days ago

      There once was a man who went mad

      When YouTube kept forcing an ad

      They kept crossing his border,

      So he bought this camcorder

      Now he’s looping his own tape of a cat.

  • iMastari@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    If just using a Smart TV for a computer monitor, what is the easiest way to keep it from sending your information? Just keeping it away from WiFi? Would it be able to connect via your HDMI?

    • nwtreeoctopus@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      Never connect to wifi. Don’t agree to the ToS. It can’t connect to your network via hdmi.

      We have a PiHole running and the TV makes constant attempts to connect to home-base.

    • tomkatt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      The other person said to never connect to wifi, but I’d say either put it on an isolated wifi (guest network) and lock it down to LAN-only access in your router, if at all possible.

      The reason being that these devices are aggressive about getting a wifi signal, and even if they can’t connect to yours, they’ll apparently search for unprotected wifi networks and connect to those to send data and phone home. Locking it down to LAN only prevents this, and isolating to a guest network means no information about other devices on your network.

      It’s utterly insane we have to do this stuff. If you’re willing to spend more, there are commercial signage displays you can buy that are essentially dumb TVs, and that is pretty much the only way to get a dumb TV today (and obviously, don’t expect smart features from it).

  • zzz711@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    Of course they are without any data privacy laws companies are going to collect and then sell as much of your personal data that they can get away with.

  • Darkscryber@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    I dumbedcmy smart tv by disconnected it from the internet. The stupid thing is the tv was requesting internet connection to work, so I had to put it on my network and then block everything so the tv pouted and then shut up.

    Now I switch to a Fire tv usb stick on it but god I hate it…

  • Fenrisulfir@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    Don’t forget that if you connect external devices to them, they’re also taking snapshots of the content “so they can serve targeted ads”.

  • Nima@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 days ago

    my TV incurred my wrath by having the gall to show me a banner ad while I was in the middle of a game.

    so I promptly cut it’s balls off. (disabled the internet entirely). now it is a dumb TV. and it behaves like a TV. and not an ad machine.

    • lolrightythen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 days ago

      I’ve never given a tv my wifi password.

      I’m not any techier than the average millennial. Maybe my trust issues are worse than average. I don’t regret my actions.

      Also - my xbox one s may have streamed more video content than provided rocket leaguery…until I tripped on a cord…

      Laptop now. Learning how to utilize these new capabilities.

      • catloaf@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 days ago

        I’ve been using a Chromecast for years. I cast whatever I want from my phone. It plays media and that’s it.

      • Fribbtastic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 days ago

        Nvidia shield with a custom launcher. Google updated their Android TV home which made 60% and More of the dashboard just ads so I added projectify as my launcher. There are now only 2 apps being shown on my screen. Plex and Google Play (for updating apps).

      • archonet@lemy.lol
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 days ago

        I usually hook my Steam Deck up to my TV via a USB hub and HDMI, and then fire something up on Plex, which I keep running on my desktop.

        Bonus: Make it a wireless HDMI dongle (which I’m too cheap for but are a thing), and now using it from the couch is even more convenient.

      • bdonvr@thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 days ago

        Apple TV has been reliable for many years. Don’t even have an iPhone or iPad anymore but the OS gets the fuck outta the way and it probably has the least spyware of all the commercial options.

        • Damage@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 days ago

          Yeah, streaming platforms are problematic even on Windows, nevermind Linux

      • loie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        10 days ago

        Honestly, the apple TV is the least spammy by a long shot. I also hear great things about the Nvidia shield, but it is pretty ancient by now. Or use a computer, but of course that’s got its own annoyances. Of course these are all the most expensive options, apparently for a reason.

        • smiletolerantly@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 days ago

          It’s ancient, but in a way I respect Nvidia for not milking it by releasing a new version every year.

          Its still a perfect decive. Fast, streams absolutely everything, amazing remote. I seriously don’t know what I would want from a new version

      • GluWu@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 days ago

        My main PC has HDMI directly to my TV because I’m not a desk gamer but my backup or when I’m using my PC heavy for something else, I have a ~4 year old flagship android phone with a USBC dock. It has a broken screen so no further mobile use but I could tape it to the back of my TV and have keyboard and mouse on android to do whatever and forget its back there.

      • Aceticon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        10 days ago

        My TV has always been run without the “smarts” ever since I bought it.

        That said, recently I’ve replaced my TV Box and Media Box with a N100 Mini PC running Linux and Kodi plus a wireless remote and in addition to that the thing even works as my home server with additional functionality than just that of the devices it replaced.

        For a cheaper/easier option try LibreELEC on top one of the devices they support (check the downloads page or the Wiki for the list). It’s basically a Linux distro with Kodi, so open and with none of the privacy intrusion risks of Android. The same kind of wireless remote (example - note that you don’t actually need to use the keyboard on the back or the air mouse) also works here since it just relies on standard shortcut keys of media programs like Kodi so works everywhere (even Android).

        However what all these privacy-protecting non-enshittified options have in common is that they’re not fully configured solutions that you just buy and use - as you’ve noticed, if you just buy a streaming stick or device it will likely be at the least “spammy” - and you do have to do some of the work to get them working.

        Something like LibreELEC on a mini PC should be the simplest to put together as the hardware comes preconfigured in an actual box and all that’s needed is to install the LibreELEC image from a bootable USB stick, but if you have a bit more technical know-how (not really that much needed, mind you) you can get something like one of the supported Orange Pi boards along with a box for it and it will cost you less than half as much as even a basic Mini PC - those boards are basically using the same chips as Android TV media boxes so you get the same performance without the “spammyness”.

      • QuarterSwede@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 days ago

        Another chiming in on the best device by a long shot is the AppleTV. It’s damn fast and its UI is actually nice to use. Oh and all the apps are always up to date. Zero ads just sitting on the screen anywhere.

      • Refurbished Refurbisher@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 days ago

        I rooted my (Android TV based) smart TV, removed all the tracking (verified with PCAPDroid), and I use Stremio and SmartTube to stream everything. I also use AFWall as a firewall to whitelist only apps that I install to access the internet only through my VPN. I set my DNS to 0.0.0.0 to block all traffic outside of my DNS if my firewall ever fails because Android TV doesn’t have that option unlike regular Android.

        I have a Hisense TV if you’re curious. You can also get a TV box that is supported by LineageOS and do the same thing on there.

        Whenever Android 10 gets super outdated, I’m hoping that Plasma Bigscreen will be advanced enough to be able to replace it, then I will just use my laptop for TV activities instead. I also would need Linux to get better HDR support (currently it only supports HDR10 and not HDR10+ or Dolby Vision) and for AMD drivers to gain HDMI 2.1 support (which is being blocked by the HDMI forum for stupid reasons. The code has been ready for a while, but AMD isn’t allowed to release it)

      • olympicyes@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 days ago

        I bought an Apple TV after I had some smart tv related issues with my Samsung. I’m happy with it and it supports any app you’d want.

      • whereBeWaldo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 days ago

        Old laptop connected to tv through hdmi + cheapest wireless mouse I could find. If you want to get fancy you can also get a wireless keyboard but screen keyboard does a good enough job

      • xthexder@l.sw0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 days ago

        I just run an old PC plugged in to my TV. It’s been running Windows, but I’m strongly considering switching it to linux now that it seems HDR on linux is getting stable. I might even use SteamOS directly since it’s got a nice interface for controller use.

        • M600@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 days ago

          Louis Rossman has a video about goes Netflix will not play 4K content on Linux. For some reason they limited the video resolution to 720.

          Not sure if it’s still an issue. Also I had my brothers login for peacock and it didn’t run on Linux at all.

          Now I’m just using a mibox, and it’s pretty good and doesn’t feel spammy.

          • xthexder@l.sw0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            10 days ago

            Looks like a nice little device. I’ve already got a similar Logitech keyboard that’s a bit bigger and is missing the IR remote, but I’m still able to turn on my TV via an HDMI CEC command.

            • chingadera@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              10 days ago

              Ah nice. We were using a mouse/on screen kb for a minute before i got fed up and did some looking around. we also didn’t have a TV remote so we thought we were killing two birds. Turns out you can only copy IR commands from another source, so I hit the bullet and bought a cheap 7 dollar remote too to program it that way were just using one device for the bedroom TV.

        • firebyte@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 days ago

          Same here, still on Windows 10 though it’s desperately trying to reinstall it’s crapware removed from the image with NTLite.

          Will be switching to some flavour of Linux at some point (we also use this PC for some Steam games), so I’ll check SteamOS out!

        • GhostlyPixel@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          10 days ago

          I didn’t realize Valve released SteamOS to be installed on other devices, that’s killer! I just threw mint on a 15 year old laptop a few weeks ago and VNC into it from my phone to control it as my streaming box.

          • Aceticon@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            10 days ago

            I’m using a N100 mini-PC with Kodi as a Media/TV Box and it works pretty much as a dedicated device would with one of these remotes.

            I seldom have to actually access it with a keyboard and mouse, though that machine also works as my home server so I do regularly access it remotelly for stuff that has nothing to do with using it as a media box.

            • GhostlyPixel@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              10 days ago

              Oh that remote is not a bad idea, does it do mouse input via the circle d pad? Or is it keyboard only?

              • Aceticon@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                9 days ago

                There’s a button there to enable/disable air-mouse functionality (basically the tilting of the remote moves the mouse pointer), though it’s awkward to use compared to a normal mouse.

                The keyboard on the back is also awkward to use, not just because the keys are small and not quite in standard positions but also because Shift and Alt are both “press to enable, press to disable”, with no notification lights (so, say, your keyboard might be in “Alt mode” and you’re trying to used it and it’s just doing weird stuff).

                The thing does work as a combo of media player remote + mouse + keyboard, but it’s not very practical for the last 2. Also that specific model seems to have problems with the remote buttons not working if the remote is tilted (which shouldn’t be at all a problem given that’s a wireless remote).

                The idea is good, the implementation could be better. There are other models like that around. Just avoid the “Google” remotes as that’s Android-locked and for voice recognition (plus it comes pre-enshittified with only a handful of buttons which only start apps such as Netflix).

                Even with the quirks of the remote, whilst using that setup I often find myself altogether forgetting that what I’m using there is a PC with Linux.

          • Anafabula@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            10 days ago

            I think they still haven’t officially released it, despite promising years ago. There are community projects like HoloISO

      • uzay@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 days ago

        Never connected my LG TV to the internet. I got an Nvidia Shield TV Pro hooked up to it. The default home screen got riddled with ads as well after I got it, but at least you can change it to a third party one and never have to see it again. Otherwise a cheap used Xbox Series S might also work, but is much bigger and arguably less flexible. And if you want a truly privacy-respecting device you might have to go with a Linux mini PC, though that’s much more involved to set up and many commercial streaming services won’t give you the full quality streams you are paying for.

      • DuskyRo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 days ago

        I use a rooted Xiaomi Mi Box 2S rooted and degoogled filtered by pi-hole and I only use stremio or jellyfin and smartube for youtube.

      • PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        10 days ago

        If you want customization and the ability to sideload apps, get an Nvidia Shield. There are custom OSes you can load which remove a lot of the spammy ad BS that the Shield’s default OS has baked in.

        If you want ease of use and setup, get an Apple TV. It won’t natively run all of your pirated hentai apps, but it at least has Plex so you can stream custom content from a server if you set one up.

  • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    One way to get Congress to act on this would be to remind them of how Robert Bork’s video rental history got released. They very quickly realized that they all had the same sleazy movies on their rental list and passed a law making it illegal to share them.

    Call your Congressmen and tell them that their smart TV is sending screenshots of whatever they’re watching back to home base, including stuff that’s not streamed, and there might be swift action.

    Better yet, hack Samsung and leak it to the press. That’ll definitely light a fire under them.

    • LunchMoneyThief@links.hackliberty.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 days ago

      The non-capitalist solutions have been here all along, mostly things licensed under copyleft. But people just need to have the wherewithal to actually use these solutions.

    • Telodzrum@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 days ago

      Ahh yes, unlike all those non-capitalist modern nations with their complete lack of widespread insidious surveillance.

  • PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    I blocked my two TVs from phoning home via my pihole. They are the two noisiest devices on my network, by leaps and bounds.

    On a day of heavy usage, my phone and desktop may get ~2000 blocked requests combined. That’s high, but not unheard of. It just means I did a lot of browsing, with a lot of blocked ad requests. My TVs average somewhere around 7500 blocked requests per day, on days that I haven’t even turned them on. That’s an attempt to phone home every ~12 seconds. And it is much worse on days that I actually use them.

    • MajorasMaskForever@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 days ago

      Jesus dude, what brand TV do you have?

      My LG issues a few hundred blocked requests throughout the day with heavy usage. I’ve never seen it wake up and phone home (my Nintendo Switch does it every hour for some stupid reason)

    • Chaotic Entropy@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      10 days ago

      To be clear though, that’s largely because it is just repeating the same request over and over as it times out and retries. They’re a lot less noisy when they actually connect successfully, though it is still undesirable for them to do so.

    • cordlesslamp@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 days ago

      Maybe i’m stupid, but why would a TV even do that? All it’s know is what you’re watching today, right? How is that information useful? If you’re living with other people, the TV couldn’t even know who’s watching, that would make the data useless.

      • Croquette@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 days ago

        Data mining. They know what you watch, when you don’t and any other habits you have.

        If you have a microphone on your remote or tv, then they also send that data over.

      • ArcticPrincess@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 days ago

        Knowing the distribution of what entire households watch is very useful. It’s not about spying on you personally.