• henfredemars@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    It doesn’t just benefit you. You’re benefiting the current users of that spectrum that for one reason or another might not be able to switch.

    I suspect most users though couldn’t tell you what frequency their network uses let alone the devices on it.

    • cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Anyone with a NAS will immediately notice that they are on 2.4GHz because it will take several times longer to transfer files.

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yup, I have one device that’s stuck on 2.4GHz, my Brother laser printer. It works fantastically otherwise and it has an Ethernet port, but I haven’t bothered to run cable yet to it. I suspect a lot of people have that one device they’d rather not replace, which is still on an old wifi standard.

      So I just make sure to have a simultaneous dual-band setup. Everything else uses 5GHz, and the 2.4GHz band exists for that one device, or if I’m on the opposite side of the house or something. I use fancy networking stuff though (Ubiquiti APs), your average person would just be confused at why the internet is sometimes slow (i.e. when the printer wakes up).

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        While my printer only supports 2.4GHz, it’s always been on Ethernet

        But too many smart home devices and media streamers, even after making an effort to stick with local IoT meshes.