• 0x4E4F@sh.itjust.worksOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Simple example, our NASes are EMC2. The devs over at the company that does the software say they’re garbage, we should change them.

    Mind you, these things have been running for 10 years straight 24/7, under load most of the time, and we’ve only swapped like 2 drives, total… but no, they’re garbage 🤦…

    • ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Accurate!

      Developers are frequently excited by the next hot thing or how some billionaire tech companies operate.

      I’m guilty of seeing something that was last updated in 2019 and having a look of disgust.

      • 0x4E4F@sh.itjust.worksOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Well, at least you admit it, not everyone does.

        I do agree that they’re out of date, but that wasn’t their point, their software somehow doesn’t like the NASes, so they had to look into where the problem was. But, their first thought was “let’s tell them they’re no good and tell them which ones to buy so we wouldn’t have to look at the code”.

          • 0x4E4F@sh.itjust.worksOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            Me too, but apparently, that wasn’t the case.

            My reasoning was, they’d have to send someone over to do tests and build the project on site, install and test, since we couldn’t give any of those NASes to them for them to work on the problem, and they’d rather not do that, since it’s a lot more work and it’s time consuming.