• I'm back on my BS 🤪@lemmy.autism.place
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Obama literally did kill an american 16 year old

      Not to be purposely irritating by being pedantic, but I think my hyper-literal thinking style is having trouble believing this. I don’t think Obama literally killed a 16 y/o. He may have given an order, approved of it, or placed someone in charge that decided to do it, but I doubt that he personally killed the 16 y/o. Is my understanding of the word “literally” incorrect in this case?

      • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Yes you are correct, he just signed off on it, and allegedly they were trying to kill someone else. I am just pretty skeptical that this wasnt some kind of message from the CIA that they will kill whoever.

    • Snowclone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      But that kid was killed by an attack marked ‘‘to whom it may concern’’, not a focused deliberate attack with his name on it. He was a casualty, not a victim of assassination.

      • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Sure allegedly it was to kill someone else that wasnt him, but it sure seems like they just “by chance” killed the son a couple weeks after the father “on accident”.

        But think of it outside of the propaganda; the president was allowed to blow up the wrong person (that happened to be an american minor in a family that had the father killed a couple weeks before) in a country that we are not at war with.