• TrueStoryBob@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 hours ago

    PornHub has been doing this. A little popup comes on screen when you pause the video for the first time.

  • Joelk111@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Apparently a hot take, but I don’t have an issue with this, as long as they’re picture ads, not videos. An option to hide them temporarily would be good if you’re trying to read something. Maybe you’d need to hold a key or something. To me this is much less intrusive than 3 videos ads at the beginning of a video.

    All of that said, I pay for premium, as I watch enough YouTube for it to be very very justified. I’ve probably saved weeks of my time not watching ads, plus it supports creators more than the ads ever do.

    • Teils13@lemmy.eco.br
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 hours ago

      You must be young (or without memory). YouTube ads started exactly with picture ads (horizontal banners), but that was not sufficient, and ~12 years later there already are 2 unskipable videos at start, middle and finish (and several at the middle if in a long video). Your ad at the pause may start with pictures even, but videos and later longer videos will follow.

    • werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 hours ago

      My noodle 🍜 has little ads built into the noodle blades. I have to eat in my room. I’ve been watching porn so most of my noodles are pornographic. Anyway, don’t look at my noodles! I get them for free with the ads.

  • sentientity@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 hours ago

    It’s excellent that alternatives and ad blockers do exist but we need regulatory action to hold companies accountable for things that are designed to worsen user experience to pressure people into paying. It’s also a serious accessibility issue, to increasingly have everything be bright and loud and motion filled and unpausable all the time. This trend goes beyond YouTube and it sucks, we need to regulate this nonsense.

    • dezmd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 hours ago

      What a weird downslope of a take that will obviously result in authoritarian government power expansion and futher censorship.

      Just stop using it and support alternatives that dont do it. Have some self control.

      • Cadenza@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Regulating capitalism = authoritarianism. What a weird take. Regulating capitalism =/= abolishing capitalism, this I can understand. But your take… wow.

      • Cyteseer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Do you think regulations are just blanket authoritarian actions. Sometimes we need government intervention to ensure and protect people’s rights.

      • sentientity@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 hours ago

        People always say shit like this as if people don’t have a multitude of different life circumstances that affect and coerce how they interact with technology. That’s just how capitalism works. It’s not a matter of willpower. Privacy Bootstraps Theory is unhelpful. Being able to completely opt out of entrenched tech monopolies is a privilege. It’s great that you can do that, not everybody can.

      • xthexder@l.sw0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Name a single viable alternative to YouTube at this point in time. Alternative frontends don’t count, since they still rely on YouTube to work. None of the creators I watch upload anywhere else.

    • interurbain1er@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 hours ago

      You’re joking but infinite growth is the broken basis of our financial system. Shareholder are legally entitled to request growth.

      YouTube has cornered the earth market, they have practically no room to grow, the only thing they have left is to increase the revenue per view, so add stuffing will get worse quarter after quarter. Eventually they’ll have to put ads in the ads and play them 5 at a time.

    • Worx@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 hours ago

      If only YouTube ads were as unobtrusive as PornHub’s… one five-second-skippable ad before each video is all I’ve ever seen

    • woelkchen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 hours ago

      I’d rather see them on pause screen than interrupting the playback but because we can’t have any nice things, interruptions will also only get worse.

      • Grenfur@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Yeah, I guarantee you google isn’t interested in showing you one or the other. They want the revenue from both. My only question is, if you pause an ad, can you get another ad in your ad?

  • where_am_i@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 hours ago

    It’s their private website, they do on it whatever they want. Right, lemmy?

    You can run your own federated streaming service that will have no ads and will be free of charge, yeah?

    • misk@sopuli.xyzOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Nobody here wants peertube really.

      They want free bandwidth (streaming 4k60), free computation (encoding, optimization), free research (codec development) and free storage (for endless amount of videos). Google sucking is a valid reason to piggyback on Google infrastructure but they seem to feel entitled to Google just letting it happen.

      • where_am_i@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 hours ago

        I never understood, and never will understand this.

        Even when I was a poor teenager and pirated essentially everything I always knew that this content only exists because someone is paying for it.

        How do people go around feeling like the best VoD platform to ever exist, available on every device imaginable, optimized for years by best software engineers the world has, should be free, and without ads is beyond me.

      • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 hours ago

        i pay for this shiti service while being data mined anyway…

        you are acting as if paying is a solution against these parasites… it aint.

      • net00@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 hours ago

        They can try to enshittify all they want, but as long as they keep offering that shit for free it’s their own fault really. There will always be a way to remove all the crap once the video images enter my computer.

        If it isn’t sustainable for them then they should have required sign in and payment long ago instead of operating at a loss just to get all the content in their place. The only ones letting it happen are themselves, we just here for the ride.

    • woelkchen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 hours ago

      No, commercial services with a dominant position in the market cannot do whatever they want.

      • where_am_i@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 hours ago

        This market domination is non-discriminatory. It’s not like you go to your local car dealerships and they don’t sell you any other brand than GM. Everyone on the internet is free to go and use any other service. It’s dominant because users are happy with their ads or subscription fees instead of investing their time into using a competing product.

        • woelkchen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Everyone on the internet is free to go and use any other service.

          Yes but that’s not the claim you made. You wrote “It’s their private website, they do on it whatever they want. Right, lemmy?” and this blanket statement is wrong. They can’t to “whatever they want” because they are bound by laws. If Google/Alphabet instituted rules on YouTube that competing video services like Nebula cannot named at all, market watchdogs would be at their heels immediately and they’d win in court if it came to it.

          Can they put ads on pause screens? Yes. Can they do “whatever they want”? No.

  • x4740N@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 hours ago

    And good people argue how adblock and sponssrblock are fair game for your shitty company practices

  • danc4498@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Just gonna say I hate this when other apps do this. I pause cause I need to concentrate on something else. Showing an ad just makes that even harder. Now I have to pause AND close the app.

  • Kyrgizion@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    15 hours ago

    This already happened. People looking up CPR instructions because a loved one is dying, only to be met with three unskippable ads.

    Goodbye Meemaw.

    • Copernican@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Proof? Aren’t there classes of videos non monetized on youtube? When I just google search for cpr and find the american red cross I quickly found written instructions as well as a youtube video that doesn’t appear to have any ads. Isn’t the problem that some video creators intentionally create videos for CPR in hopes of monetizing?

      • dch82@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        https://support.google.com/youtube/thread/83733719?hl=en

        This means as a creator that’s not in YPP [Youtube Partner Program], you may see ads on some of your videos. Since you’re not currently in YPP, you won’t receive a share of the revenue from these ads, though you’ll still have the opportunity to apply for YPP as you normally would once you meet the eligibility requirements.

    • Lord Wiggle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Yeah, that may be so, but priorities man. Priorities! Think of our profits man! In this harsh economy, ever ad counts! We’re only controlling 90% of the internet while we strive for 100%. That’s 10% short. 10%! We only had a revenue of 305 billion in 2023 which is not nearly enough to cut down on ads. Billionaire lives matter man! Come on, everybody, say it all together: Make millionaires billionaires again! Billionaires first! Meemaws don’t consume enough anyway. Screw her. By the way, want some penis enlargement pills?

    • retrieval4558@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Not defending YouTube here, but CPR is so time sensitive that if they were looking up instructions, she was a goner anyway.

      • YeetPics@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Hey look, a blatant lie disguised as a fact!

        I wonder how this furthers your agenda…

      • baru@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Have you had CPR training? What you stated isn’t true. Every second counts. But looking up instructions and seeing a easy video will still help massively.