return2ozma@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agoUS can’t ban TikTok for security reasons while ignoring Temu, other apps, TikTok arguesarstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square106fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1external-linkUS can’t ban TikTok for security reasons while ignoring Temu, other apps, TikTok arguesarstechnica.comreturn2ozma@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square106fedilink
minus-squareUnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·20 hours agoBut explicit prohibition on continued operation if they don’t. ByteDance is not affected outside of the US. Only US employees are being threatened.
minus-squarefinitebanjo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·17 hours agoByteDance employees chose to work for a Chinese PsyOp parent company who refuses to sell ByteDance. If anything, those employees are suffering because the CCP were given too many rights and protections for owning a business in the USA.
minus-squareUnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·17 hours agoSo you’re agreeing this is a Bill of Attainder limited to a single group of American citizens? Thanks.
But explicit prohibition on continued operation if they don’t. ByteDance is not affected outside of the US. Only US employees are being threatened.
ByteDance employees chose to work for a Chinese PsyOp parent company who refuses to sell ByteDance. If anything, those employees are suffering because the CCP were given too many rights and protections for owning a business in the USA.
So you’re agreeing this is a Bill of Attainder limited to a single group of American citizens?
Thanks.