• Hupf@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Out of all the painters in this tweet, van Gogh was the second most successful. That’s gotta count for something.

  • RubberDuck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Than she can rest knowing that maybe long after she is dead, billionaires will trade in her paintings and hoard them in tax free zones at airports as ways to hide their money from the IRS.

    • 3ntranced@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      So question, I understand the whole using art as a money laundering/asset/what have you with the freeports etc. But as an artist, could I just team up with a crew of friendly millionaires and just have them buy my art at exorbitant prices to drive up it’s perceived market value, and just slip the initial investors a majority of their payment back?

  • FauxPseudo @lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I used to be a pretty famous ASCII artist. Actually made money from it. I made enough money to cover all of my art school education and every art supply I’d ever bought. Which means I’m a successful artist.

    My ex had my old phone number. I got a message from her to check her voicemail. And then I got a message that she hated me. The voicemail was offering me a job as an ASCII artist. She hated me because I always seem to make money off of the absolute dumbest hobbies. I respected her for saying that.

  • burghler@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Is this true? Because he didn’t deal with selling his paintings, that was his brother Theo’s job (an art dealer). The arrangement they had was Theo would finance Vincents art life while Vincent would send him all his art. They were both very happy to do this arrangement and frequently wrote to eachother often. In fact the main reason van Gogh is so famous is because of all these letters which allowed us to learn about Vincents life and tragic end.

  • Fosheze@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Why did she only capitalize a single “I”? Like it’s litterally the only capital letter. Also she didn’t capitalize the other “i”. Why didn’t she just leave them all lowercase? I need to know this.

    • _____@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Intentionally lowercased the I because zoomers think formal writing is harsh or mean. Likely the next I was capitalized through autocorrect. Most zoomers completely disabled autocorrect so they can type in all lowercase

        • floridaman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Gen Z here, mostly serious. not for that specific reason, it’s just more of a general trend in informal writing. i don’t have autocorrect off so that i can have apostrophes and hyphenation etc, but i manually lowercase every i when writing, usually…

          • _____@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            I forgot to add this but younger people also think of ellipsis as ominous and having bad undertones like subtle anger

            • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              Weird. For me, the ellipsis is just a way of “trailing off” like I would when I speak. Kids these days… (no anger, just leaving off the “old man yelling at clouds” bits for brevity)

              • SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                Language evolves, as it always has

                Especially in informal writing, tone is important, so various techniques end up developing to transmit that tone. Formal writing, which is what writing mostly used to be used for, does not use large amounts of tone

      • BougieBirdie@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        You don’t need to use a period on the internet if it’s the end of a line. The line break signals the end of the sentence, unless maybe they trailed off in

        • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          You really should though. Not ending with a period just looks… off. And there’s really no reason not to, on phones, the period is generally right next to the send button on mobile, and it takes pretty much no extra effort on a regular keyboard.

          Stop being lazy and actually end your sentences…

          • MBM@lemmings.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            If you’re typing a single sentence it’s pretty common to leave out the period, this just keeps it consistent

          • BarrelAgedBoredom@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Informal text communication has increasingly played with punctuation and grammar to indicate tone, emotion, and cadence. This has been happening for decades. Language is a tool that is fluid and malleable. There are only rules insofar as there is broad consensus on how language works at the moment. Stop being a weenie

          • EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            It probably has to do with strict character limits and the habit spreading. Twitter is only, what, 156 characters? I know text messages used to be something similar, and early on, they cost around 3 cents a letter and you had to hit the numbers multiple times to cycle through to the letter or punctuation that you wanted. It’s where stuff like l33t speak came from, at least.

            • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              Fair. I grew up with 140 character limits for SMS and having limits on how many texts I could send, so I get it. But instead of cutting out punctuation, I used more direct language and abbreviations. Now that there’s no real limit on texts, I’m a bit more wordy and am extra careful about punctuation, especially since I use swipe texting.