• crashfrog@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’ve gone to every link you’ve provided to me and none of them were a UN study.

    Because you won’t read past the abstract. I can only give you the sources; I can’t make you read them.

    Also a funny story, one link I provided you had multiple IPC reports.

    You didn’t provide a link.

    t. Or you wouldn’t have said something so demonstrably false about Gazan aid being turned around.

    It’s not a news story about aid being turned around in Gaza. It’s a news story about aid being turned around at the Gazan border because it contains impermissible dual-use items that are forbidden in aid shipments to Gaza.

    Finally, accusing UNRWA of incompetence while blocking and attacking their aid convoys has been an Israeli propaganda line for most of the past ~10 months.

    You’re correct that it’s propaganda but you’ve misattributed it. It’s Hamas propaganda.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      If the paper says something the abstract doesn’t then it’s a bad paper or a bad abstract.

      I absolutely provided a link, it’s even labeled, “IPC Report Link”.

      And no. The news article is very clear these checkpoints are inside Gaza, not at the border. Which again is there for you and everyone else to read.

      And lmao you think Hamas is what? Paying the UN to say they’ve been attacked by Israel? You know what don’t answer that. I’m not sure why I even replied to this post since it’s very obvious your only angle here is to deny all evidence of Israel’s crimes. No matter how damning.

      • crashfrog@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        If the paper says something the abstract doesn’t then it’s a bad paper or a bad abstract.

        The whole point of an abstract is that it’s not the entire paper, stupid

          • crashfrog@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            I continue to recommend that you read the paper past the abstract, hope that helps

            • Maggoty@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              I continue to live in hope you will realize victim blaming the people you blow up isn’t an argument.

              • crashfrog@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 months ago

                Does war exist, in your view? Or is it always a case of the winner murdering the loser, unjustifiably?

                • Maggoty@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  There is a large difference between war and genocide. The last group to say you couldn’t have a war without genocide was the Serbians.

                  • crashfrog@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    2 months ago

                    There is a large difference between war and genocide.

                    But that’s what I’m asking you. Can one side achieve overwhelming victory, in your view, without you calling it a “genocide”?

                    No, right?