So in your head, people are rich because they throw away their money?
Nothing says “cheap” more than clothes which are pretending to be expensive. If you’re going to dress up, wear your better clothes that are in your normal style.
Personally I wouldn’t bother. Just wear what you normally wear. Not everyone is interested in clothes even if they have money.
That’s where I assumed it was going.
Unlikely. You probably will injest the poison and die, and depending on if the poison also acts as a venom they may / may not.
It’s probably more accurate to say "Venoms are injected. Poisons are injested. "
…and people worry about the name of a git branch.
I don’t view free-use models as open-source. Open-source means I can rebuild it from scratch and I can’t because I don’t know what the training data is, or have access to it.
The scale is the difference and who is harmed.
Billion dollar company losing $100. Who cares?!
Billion dollar company stealing from all artists in the world. We care.
Points 2 and 3. Basically make restrictions on normal user accounts which are fine for humans but that will make bots swear and curse.
Unless you mean “what should the registration process be” I think API keys via a user account would do.
Bad Britain has 4 countries thank you very much.
Exactly the reason I suggest it.
Shrinkflation is smaller quantities
Yes
and/or higher prices.
No. That’s just normal inflation.
An LLMs “intent” is always to give you a plausible response even if it doesn’t have the “knowledge”. The same behaviour in a human would be classed as lying IMHO.
Make bot accounts a separate type of account so legitimate bots don’t appear as users. These can’t vote, are filtered out of post counts and users can be presented with more filtering option for them. Bot accounts are clearly marked.
Heavily rate limit any API that enables posting to a normal user account.
Make having a bot on a human user account bannable offence and enforce it strongly.
Agreed, It wouldn’t be a good thing. However it’s their own failures and mismanagement that are causing it.
It’s certainly arguable that the algorithm constitutes an editorial process and so that opens them up to libel laws and to liability.
Fair point.
Stupid sharks loose their teeth, not their fins that actually do the work.
Errr…wat!!!
The shark dies either way.
Under what law?
UK currently holds the people that post things liable for their own words. X, the platform, just relays what is said. Same as Lemmy. Same as Mastodon.
If you ban X I don’t see why those other platforms wouldn’t be next.
Now should people/organisations/companies leave X? Absolutely! Evacuate like it’s a house of fire. Should it be shut down by legal means? No.
Screen 0 deleted because of no matching config section.
Your XOrg conf ig has got hard definitions of your devices which aren’t matching what is being detected. Probably best to let auto detection do it’s thing.
So are they really mammals?