Infamous implies somebody is famous in a negative way. If anything, Gabe is a shining example that should be upheld.
Infamous implies somebody is famous in a negative way. If anything, Gabe is a shining example that should be upheld.
Fair point, I suppose that depends on the definition of veganism you prefer. Usually a moot point since you can’t meaningfully apply it to anybody but humans.
Well, humans are technically animals, so no.
Assuming they were wearing a space suit, probably nothing very different from ordinary decomposition except the lack of insects
No, just brain damaged from oxygen deprivation
Probably because they didn’t know WHICH type of mercury you had. Organic mercury can kill on touch with a single drop. Best not to take chances.
The features of successful systems, Ostrom and her colleagues found, include clear boundaries (the ‘community’ doing the managing must be well-defined); reliable monitoring of the shared resource; a reasonable balance of costs and benefits for participants; a predictable process for the fast and fair resolution of conflicts; an escalating series of punishments for cheaters; and good relationships between the community and other layers of authority, from household heads to international institutions.
Somehow the author extrapolates this into ‘Tragedy can be avoided, therefore it doesn’t exist and is a myth’. What is this ridiculous logic?
Here’s the actual news release without the clickbait farm. https://www.media.mit.edu/projects/alterego/overview/
Press X to doubt, though. It’s probably nowhere near as accurate or adaptable as MIT implies. University PR depts are infamous for blowing hot air.
Edit: It’s from 2019. It’s definitely hot air
Those are some weird looking titties
Ok, that IS obnoxious
I want to believe
https://stamurai.com/blog/stuttering-and-singing-what-we-understand/
Most of the points listed here don’t matter a hoot to the average user.