I’m sorry, what? I guess I’ll just add this to my list of reasons I’m glad I use Android
My old Sony android phone did a factory reset in my pocket because I supposedly got the unlock code wrong a few times.
I never touched the damned thing and the first I knew about it was because my pocket felt warm.
If it’s the first one when why the fuck is it called the 4004 and not just the 1?!
Factually inaccurate.
Soon… Any … Day… Now… https://youtu.be/KbgvSi35n6o
I think climate change will top that list soon.
Some people really will believe anything, as long as you’re trash talking big tech. And this platform is particularly bad.
Just say something like you should be paying for YouTube (via ads or premium) and brace for the swarm.
Scotland? Australia? Armenia?
We were supposed to stop?!
What? No. What utter nonsense.
I should be able to remove a website that I created and paid for without there being some silly law that I have to archive it.
As the owner, it’s up to me if I want it up or not. After all, I’m paying for the bloody thing.
Just buy an older supported device if grapheneos is important to you. Something like a 6 pro would be fine.
Why did a moderator remove my comment?
Do you want this place to die? Because excessive moderation is how this place dies.
wait, what are you even buying then?!
A link.
I’m not joking.
It’s just a link.
You click it. You see the image in your browser, assuming the server it links to is still running and the owner of the server has not deleted the image.
Then you right click and save the image. Like literally anyone else can do.
Yes. It’s just as retarded as it sounds.
It’s not even that.
There is a huge lack of insight into who owns the copyright of an NFT. This confusion likely stems from the fact that an NFT comprises two things: (i) the identifiable, non-fungible, non-replicable, and transferrable cryptographic asset recorded on the blockchain, and (ii) the creative content. The creative content is separate and distinct from the actual asset recorded on the blockchain. As such, the person or entity that created the creative content owns the copyright. The content creator continues to own the copyright, even if the NFT is sold to someone else. It’s analogous to Jeff Koons selling artwork he created—Koons can sell the art to one person to hang on their wall, but since Jeff also owns the copyright, he can sell that same artwork as an image on t-shirts.
https://bpp.msu.edu/magazine/nfts-what-you-need-to-know-to-protect-copyrights-june2022/
NFTs are literally just URLs, pointlessly stored on “the blockchain”. URLs that point to servers which can be switched off at any moment.
GeckoView more specifically in this case. But yes.
Sure you can. Car manufacturers do it today.
You will have to define “3 years” as well. It can’t be a blanket 3 calendar year thing, it would have to be X number of cycles which the average user would realistically hit with 3 years of usage. Not someone glued to their phone playing games all day that need to charge three times a day.
The rendering engine.
Currently Firefox on iOS is “just” a skin around the iOS provided renderer.
Trust us, we are printing all this money for your own good.
Your. Own. Good.
Something like that I assume.
Nothing. There is literally no legitimate use I can think of
As you wish: https://wiby.me/surprise/
Come on now, Excel isn’t that bad.