knightly the Sneptaur

  • 21 Posts
  • 81 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: July 5th, 2023

help-circle
  • After the election maybe? That seems rather late to me.

    Hence this discussion where I made my intentions known well in advance of the election.

    Direct action and building up third party alternatives seems to be the best long term courses of action.

    Direct action is an easy way to end up in jail (even feeding the homeless is illegal now) and third-parties are useless due to our first-past-the-post electoral system.

    The best long-term courses of action are mutual aid and the development of alternative structures of power that can serve human needs without being subject to the whims of the existing political establishment.

    If I were american I would work towards unionizing as many people as possible, report that I won’t vote democrat, and then vote democrat unless a third party has a chance of winning in my state.

    This is acceptable.



  • I’ve seen people debate this endlessly, but I’ve never seen anyone on the side of not voting explain anything beyond “I don’t want to support genocide” as if the republicans aren’t just as gung ho about killing children. What is the utility in not participating in the election? What do you think not voting will achieve?

    I’m already planning not to vote for Republicans.

    I pay careful attention to local races and evaluate every candidate because I believe voting to be a civic rssponsibility.

    But my fundamental principle when choosing who to vote for is not tactical, but moral. I will not vote in support of people that I believe will perpetuate injustice in the world.

    You aren’t sending a signal and you certainly aren’t making the democrats commit less genocide.

    Voting downballot but making no choice for president sends a very clear signal. The DNC just decided they didn’t need the uncommitted vote and they’re probably right.

    Voting democrat is the lesser evil and will have actual positive results for people living in the US, and it isn’t mutually exclusive with other ways of enacting change.

    I disagree on principle. Voting for a lesser evil is still voting to perpetuate evil. At best, it maintains an intolerable status quo, and it comes from a fear of the radical change that we know is sorely needed. “Lesser evilism” is conservatism.