PitLoversNeedMeds

Fair enough! Thanks for the detailed write-up

What about PostgreSQL?

You legitimised the Americans’ reasons for needing a refuge in Canada.

All while your country is actively shipping “immigrants” to Guantanamo bay and other concentration camps, or Uganda.

The irony is certainly lost on you, due to your blind belief that America deserves what it doesn’t give others. It’s pretty clearly visible.

Exactly! So many people assume the science of economics is unfounded because of what some purported “economists” say online or because of some already-irrelevant methodologies the science has abandoned for years already…

The most egregious problem being assuming that the methodology isn’t sound and scientific, and that it instead depends on the whims of the researcher (here they would place researcher in quotation marks, I imagine).

I have had to do game theory, statistics, econometrics, data science (thanks to my chosen specialisation), a lot of math especially about optimisations and linear algebra… And the quality of the academic research is empirical. Rarely will you even find a paper that only uses qualitative data in economics, except maybe in the behavioural economics field. Most often we use natural experiments to replicate RCTs within a macro environment, or double-blind experiments to investigate an economic agent’s systemic preferences and responses within a micro environment…

People who complain about the superficiality of the “soft sciences” have never stepped foot in a class beyond the very basics of that subject taught in highschool. They therefore project their current knowledge on the entire field, marring it…

I hate this :'|

Cool flag

Funny you should say that, because those very humanities aspects of what I studied, Economics, lead STEM students to disparage it as a non-scientific field built of gospel and tenets. As if Humanities diminished the quality of the research and teaching within the Economics field.

So while I agree, and it’s good to see you being upvoted, in a different scenario the application of your thoughts about this will lead the person sharing their experience to get massively downvoted in an attempt to shame them for studying a “soft science”.

Don’t blame autocorrect for this. Blame the poor parenting, who is rearing its head once again to blame anything but themselves.

Je lis Reverend Insanity de Gu Zhen Te (traduit, bien sûr). Et je compte commencer The Will of The Many par James Islington.

So you believe that people applying for refugee status in the US and getting deported don’t have legitimate reasons.

Gross.

It is exceptionalism after all.

This fucking sucks.

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

Oh so “America first” in immigration as well?

Only MURICANS can immigrate and should get refugee status

American exceptionalism can suck my dick.

Right alongside gender fluid.

His money’s there alright.

You’re a dickhead.

Cool I guess? They’re at war with China so I’ll take what I can get.

Oh shit, that’s scary.

For the author that’s probably a fantasy, who comes up with that otherwise? Yikes though for that mental imagery 😬