AOCapitulator [they/them, she/her]

Always was, since literally the moment of its creation, what?

It is the moral imperative of all living humans to strive to murder Elon must as soon as possible

talking out my ass, I’m guessing its because oxygen is an energetic and highly reactive element, and therefore it can do lots of things and it does them really well (or at least strongly), or in general was just the best most direct means to accomplish the energy intensive tasks that were required given the biosphere we evolved in? I’m not sure how common/ vital oxygen consumption was before that one mass extinction where algae became overabundant and oxygenated the atmosphere and caused a mass extinction, it could have been a result of adaptation to that new condition- though I doubt this is the case

what are these images pointing out?

Wow, really horrifying how you can see the spasms of violence since 2004 in the frequency bunching of these recognition dates. Like, you can tell shit went down in 2011 and 2024

Post for old people

I dunno friend, after reading a bunch of comments here it sounds like this may not be true, please edit this to include the context or a source to the claim

Project Hail Mary, Discworld 41 The Shephard’s Crown

after looking just now I don’t see any specific mention, that may be a rumor actually

Lol

Wow you definitely know what you’re talking about lmfao

What word got removed?

In season 3 they hyped up that another character trained for months to fight him, and a full out punch from her dents a filing cabinet and they shoot it like we’re supposed to be impressed, superman could obliterate the planet with a flick of his finger from what I’m lead to believe

He wasn’t using a scope

And do

Yeah no economics is absolutely a fake science

I don’t disagree it should have been phrased more accurately. The truest version is always the best, OP should probably add an edit to add that he wasn’t sentenced he was charged with crimes that would result in that, however, The point of this post was not the legal distinction between charged and convicted

I think the detail you’re arguing about is about as impactful as what color shirt someone was wearing in an otherwise true account of history.

I’m not endorsing misinforming people, thank you for correcting that bit of information, its does not change the essence of why this information is being shared or the conclusion it brings us to.

Law is not science, it’s politics. This is a political distinction, not a matter of the laws of reality

Their comment wasn’t a dissertation, i didn’t expect extreme precision, I’m defending the spirit in which I believe that comment was posted, because I agree with it, simple as

Looks likely he would have been convicted, especially considering the whole suicide thing??

Basically the same thing, calling it misinformation implies its creating a perception of the incident that is unwarranted, where I would disagree that the distinction has any merit

After googling it it seems he was charged and those were the estimate of years if convicted so