I’m sorry but it’s true. Graphene OS sucks the big one… It’s absolutely janky when it comes to its Android app support, it’s UI is absolutely atrocious, and all around. It’s simply a wonky operating system.

Not only that but the whole premise of of making an operating system built only for Google pixel hardware on top of Android Open source project is just silly when it comes to the idea of “privacy”. That would be like trying to open up a gay nightclub in Qatar. Google could snap its fingers tomorrow and lock down the ability to unlock bootloaders.

What do you think? Am I wrong here guys?

  • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    16 days ago

    That would be like trying to open up a gay nightclub in Qatar.

    It’s not just qatar. It’s many many allies of the fascist USA.

  • Auli@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    16 days ago

    I’ll agree with you in the UI. There black and white icons suck.

      • Novaling@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        16 days ago

        Lmao yeah, with lawnchair my phone feels cute and silly. Even before using lawnchair I just used paperize for auto changing wallpapers, added some icons to my homepage, ignored the black system apps, and was happy for about 6 months or so. Like UI is not the fucking issue here.

        Screenshot of a Android home screen using the home app lawnchair. The wallpaper background is Hatsune Miku in the style of a Katamari Damacy character.

  • JustVik@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    17 days ago

    It’s not their fault that they can’t make Graphene OS for more models. It’s the fault of the manufacturers of these smartphones who always put a stick in the wheel for anyone who wants to make a privacy oriented OS for their smartphone models.

    • ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      16 days ago

      for a privacy oriented OS you don’t need a very specific security chip that only a single pije of phones have. that’s maximalism.

  • someacnt@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    16 days ago

    As a user, I can definitely say that GrapheneOS is the single best project in the open source space. 99.99% of stuff works out-of-the-box, with de-facto feature parity. The remaining 0.01% is the one dumb investing app which I can only assume has sneaky spyware on it.

      • stink@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        16 days ago

        Yeah, I can access all my banking perfectly fine on GrapheneOS. Never ran into a compatibility issue with anything to be honest.

  • aspid@scribe.disroot.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    16 days ago

    As I know some use Google pixel hardware because bootloader can be unlocked and then locked again (for security reason) with custom rom. Read that One+ allow do the same. With other vendors you can only unlock bootloader if vendor allow.

  • Salamander@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    17 days ago

    OK, fine… I’ll be honest…

    I have had good experiences with it. I have not had problems with apps. Most of my apps I get via Obtaininum. As for the UI, I think it is fine.

    I don’t think Google will be able to lock my Pixel’s bootloader, and, if they do, well it is already running the OS. So it shouldn’t be a problem for a while. If at some time GrapheneOS stops being supported I will find something else. I don’t need a guarantee of permanence to find it useful today.

  • Autonomous User@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    17 days ago

    Before complaining, what have you done? What does your post do?

    You post like a PSYOP, like we should give up, like there is no hope, WRONG.

    At least they are trying. What you are you doing to defend our software freedom?

      • Nelots@piefed.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        17 days ago

        Several of them are from the OP alone. Look at their post history, and at least the last three posts have dedicated a sentence or two on calling GrapheneOS bad.

        • Autonomous User@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          16 days ago

          You are absolutely right. I just saw their history. They really do post like an active psyop.

          Whatever you read here, remember, think ‘does this post give us power or take it away?’

  • arnitbier@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    15 days ago

    Wondering if engaging here is the wrong move but this is hoooooly shit levels of bullschibe ragebait

    Fuck that shit its awesome and yeah that’s not how any of that works

  • helpImTrappedOnline@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    17 days ago

    Honestly, its not perfect, but at least I’m not having ai prompts and constant adverts shoved in my face.

    The stock Graphine apps and home launcher are very basic, they didn’t focus on them because there are prethora of better options already out there. For the basics, I recommend lawnchair, fossify gallary, fossify file manager, fossify phone, and open camera. For messages, I’ve got nothing. Only thing I’ve found that works right with group chats and sending pictures is google messages…

  • FauxLiving@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    17 days ago

    This isn’t even a bad opinion, it’s just ignorance.

    It only has a problem with some banking apps, the ui is stock android, the premise isn’t to make an operating system built only for Google Pixels it’s to make a secure OS and currently Pixels are the only hardware that meets the requirements and hypothetical futures can be imagined to make any product sound doomed.

    • Seraphim@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      17 days ago

      I’ve used banking apps in the browser with no issue. The ui being stock is a non-issue for me.

  • sic_semper_tyrannis@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    17 days ago

    I totally disagree. I’ve had very very minimal issues with anything on GrapheneOS and they use Pixel hardware because they have extra hardware security chips in them

  • june (she/her)@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    15 days ago

    The UI is just AOSP android, simple and ugly (imo) as always. It’s not unique in that either, most OEMs have a skin based on AOSP in some way.

    As for the app support, I have had very little issues over the past year on GrapheneOS. Aside from some apps being exclusive to the play store (ie they don’t host them elsewhere and Aurora doesn’t have a copy), I have a pretty seamless experience. And yes, including banking apps.

    Tap to pay doesn’t work (they’re upfront about that) but NFC is still fully features in my experience.