Google’s campaign against ad blockers across its services just got more aggressive. According to a report by PC World, the company has made some alterations to its extension support on Google Chrome.

Google Chrome recently changed its extension support from the Manifest V2 framework to the new Manifest V3 framework. The browser policy changes will impact one of the most popular adblockers (arguably), uBlock Origin.

The transition to the Manifest V3 framework means extensions like uBlock Origin can’t use remotely hosted code. According to Google, it “presents security risks by allowing unreviewed code to be executed in extensions.” The new policy changes will only allow an extension to execute JavaScript as part of its package.

Over 30 million Google Chrome users use uBlock Origin, but the tool will be automatically disabled soon via an update. Google will let users enable the feature via the settings for a limited period before it’s completely scrapped. From this point, users will be forced to switch to another browser or choose another ad blocker.

Archive link

    • lnxtx@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      I will happily donate.
      If, of course, money won’t go to the CEO.

      • umbrella@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        it is lol, have you seen how much the ceo is paying herself?

        its kind of a reddit situaton, where money wouldnt be that much of an issue if it werent for the ceo.

      • stoy@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        A CEO is a needed possition, I know in the past the Brendan Eich was controversial in his political views, but Laura Chambers seems ok so far

        • BRINGit34@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          A CEO is a needed possition

          Ha! Good one…

          oh wait. You’re serious…

          How is a ceo needed? They do no work. Their entire job is to rake in cash from workers.

          All a ceo needs is a guillotine.

          • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            Right.

            And a football team doesn’t need a quarterback.

            🤦🏼‍♂️

            Yes, many of them are assholes, doesn’t change the need for the leadership.

          • stoy@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            Ok, granted that the CEO concept is not the only way to lead a company.

            But you do need a leader, someone who can make decisions for the company, someone to make everyday decisions that are not fun, but needed to make the company work.

            We can absolutely argue about their compensation, but thst is another argument alltogether.

            • Cataphract@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 months ago

              Here’s a short animated Ted Talk about co-ops without CEO’s. Decisions can be decided by the workers, I think there’s some disconnect on what you’re imagining a CEO is. If you’re needing to make decisions everyday for the company to work… well you’re looking at something like Twitter which isn’t a stable company in a lot of ways. The video goes on to explain how co-ops operate and perform successfully through the centuries and a good starting point if you haven’t been introduced to the business model before.

              Managers or “presidents” do exist, but the big difference is their role is to implement the decisions made by the group and does away with the usual power structure that influences and hurts the workers (usually through wage theft like the record bonuses CEO’s collect while making decisions for the share holders, not the consumers or employees).

    • haui@lemmy.giftedmc.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Not sure firefox will be on our side after the recent ad tracking debacle. If they implement one more anti consumer feature I‘m jumping ship.

      • przmk@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Jump ship to what? Not like there’s s lot of choices out there. You could always try LibreWolf.

        • haui@lemmy.giftedmc.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          That would be my first address, assuming the librewolf folks will never accept anti community code, hopefully.

          If everything fails i‘m fine to join a small project and help with it. I have some skills and can contribute financially.

          • przmk@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            They plan a release for 2028. It’s going to be a while before it can be used for everyday browsing.

            • JustMarkov@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 months ago

              That’s true, but it’s worth waiting. Until then Librewolf is probably the best choice.

          • GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            Purged of unwanted and intrusive features, UBO pre installed, and is pre configured for increased privacy.

            • NOP@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 months ago

              Tried librewolf recently and although worked well (linux mint) had all sorts of scaling issues and wouldn’t keep my settings. Just using as a backup to FF until I can figure it out. FF only just started failing to play YT unhindered.

              • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                3 months ago

                Could very well be a mint issue. It’s a bit wonky at times with regular system windows.

              • Petter1@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                3 months ago

                Things are getting strange if you activate too much privacy settings. For example, all websites appear in light mode (because most people use light and thus is less value to track you) and for some reason, webUI with integrated terminals were not able to draw the ASCII text, it was just rainbows 😂 (proxmox and hombridge)