• Samvega@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    The issue with the Star Wars story is that it can’t end. This means Luke cannot have been very effective, because the same issues have to repeat historically to promote an endless cycle of protagonists and antagonists and battles that relate to the previous fan-favourites (because nostalgia sells).

    Therefore Luke must simultaneously be an awesome hero, and also just some loser that didn’t really do anything that worked.

    • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      I think legends handled it okay, that the battle of yavin was the tipping point, but the empire still had remnants that needed to be countered by the New Republic. And the New Republic has its own problems, but faces an entirely different threat than the empire too.

      Whereas with the new movies, they just hit the reset button back to episode four, rather than developing on the trajectory in interesting ways, which would have given Luke’s actions and the original trilogy more weight.

      • Samvega@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        The point of a successful Disney media franchise is not to provide nuance and provoke thought, but instead to sell merch for profit.

          • TotallynotJessica@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Homie was a film school nerd who took a gamble that paid off. People that ONLY want to make money don’t take such huge risks or put so much pretentious thought into pulp. He made it to make a ton of money because it literally couldn’t happen any other way. How else do you get rich people to invest that much money?