• lugal@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Remindes me of the tweet that said something like “My favorite moment on the internet was when someone said, they believe that people will changed their mind when given evidence. Then I linked TWO SOURCES that said otherwise and they were like I still believe it.”

    Or when a hexbearian explained to me that hexbear isn’t toxic at all, it’s just when people refuse to read sources but than it’s their fault for not engaging with the material. Later they refused to open my sources.

    • splonglo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      The person you’re talking to is unlikely to be pursuaded but there’s usually silent, invisible lurkers who can be.

      I know I’ve changed my mind on things because of arguments I’ve read on the internet.

      It is proven that people do double down on their views when confronted with opposing evidence, but IMO this is more about the psychology of trust and confrontation between individuals, rather than proof of the futility of argument as a concept. Hell, Vsauce made a video called ‘The Future of Reasoning’, where he makes the case that argument might have been selected for as an essential part of human psychology and necessary for our survivial.

      • lugal@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        True. Sometimes it takes more than one random person on the internet to convince you but they might be part of starting a thought process.