Just because the technology involves politics shouldn’t mean it can’t belong here also. Why do they have to be mutually exclusive? I’m not pushing my beliefs on anyone here.
If you read the article (which I can only assume you did), it goes into detail about a how even hackers from Black Hat and DEFCON (two well known cybersecurity conventions) were donating to a cause they believe in. It even goes on to talk about hacking voting machines.
You look like an idiot by whining that this submission is about politics and not relevant to technology. And every additional comment adds to your idiocy.
Just because the technology involves politics shouldn’t mean it can’t belong here also. Why do they have to be mutually exclusive? I’m not pushing my beliefs on anyone here.
If you read the article (which I can only assume you did), it goes into detail about a how even hackers from Black Hat and DEFCON (two well known cybersecurity conventions) were donating to a cause they believe in. It even goes on to talk about hacking voting machines.
Seems like “technology” to me.
Literally every second word is about politics, names or institutions. Technlogy was merely mentioned.
You could either set up a filter, or go full-Karen and complain about it.
I see you chose the second option.
Literally everything in the world has political implications. Get over yourself
Some more some less.
Stop while you’re behind lolololol
Behind? Behind what? The US is a third world country in many aspects. You mean military spending?
You look like an idiot by whining that this submission is about politics and not relevant to technology. And every additional comment adds to your idiocy.