• fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      There is a small silver lining, according to the VX team: “The database DOES NOT contain information from individuals who use data opt-out services. Every person who used some sort of data opt-out service was not present.” So, we guess this is a good lesson in opting out.

      Wonder what the best opt-out service is.

  • MIDItheKID@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Is there a simple way to find out if your Information was in this leak, and what information it is? I use haveibeenpwned for leaks linked to my email address, but from I read in this article, it’s not linked to my email address.

    So how do I found out if my data was leaked without paying for a credit monitoring service?

  • AWittyUsername@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Is this why I got the latest scam email saying I need to pay $4k in bitcoin else a video of me wanking would be leaked.

  • Fredselfish@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Oh well I feel at this point every man woman and child already had this done to them in United States and our government not doing shit about it.

  • Telorand@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    A complaint submitted to the US District Court for the Southern District of Florida claims the exposed personal data belongs to a public records data provider named National Public Data, which specializes in background checks and fraud prevention.

    What’s with these companies nobody has heard of causing massive fuck ups?

  • Spotlight7573@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    With a breach of this size, I think we’re officially at the point where the data about enough people is out there and knowledge based questions for security should be considered unsafe. We need to come up with different authentication methods.

    • floofloof@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      We have different authentication methods. The hard bit is persuading people to use them.

      • Spotlight7573@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Before people can be persuaded to use them, we have to persuade or force the companies and sites to support them.

        • Nurgus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Indian accent: Hello, this is Microsoft support. Your private key is being hacked and you need to give it to us immediately for safe keeping.

          WCGW?

    • Uli@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Pirate keys for sure. Not using one is just asking for a stranger to grab your booty.

      • ag10n@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Tying a password to a browser or device isn’t going to make it any easier. Use a password manager and set unique string passwords for everything. If the app supports it, use FIDO physical keys instead of Passkeys

        • 1984@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Even better would be to use certificates instead of passwords. What if every website gave you a certificate signed by them, and you store that in your password manager automatically.

          Maybe that’s what passkeys are… Haven’t read up on them at all.

          • Spotlight7573@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            Basically with passkeys you have a public/private key pair that is generated for each account/each site and stored somewhere on your end somehow (on a hardware device, in a password manager, etc). When setting it up with the site you give your public key to the site so that they can recognize you in the future. When you want to prove that it’s you, the website sends you a unique challenge message and asks you to sign it (a unique message to prevent replay attacks). There’s some extra stuff in the spec regarding how the keys are stored or how the user is verified on the client side (such as having both access to the key and some kind of presence test or knowledge/biometric factor) but for the most part it’s like certificates but easier.

        • QuarterSwede@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          … passkeys basically do all this without you having to know how. Your device /is/ the physical key and /you/ are the secondary auth. It honestly doesn’t get any easier for the user.

          • ag10n@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            What options are there for migrating passkeys to a new device? Easy to lock you into that iPhone and you must use their migration tool when you upgrade. Or I just carry it on my keychain, no vendor lock in.

            • QuarterSwede@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              3rd party password managers are already adding passkey support. Passkeys isn’t an Apple only security technology. FIDO has its place but passkeys is the future for most people like it or not.

              • ag10n@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 month ago

                Do I need a subscription service for this passkey supported password manager? Or I can just buy a hardware key that can be used on my phone or any device, password manager supported or not. Seems like the freedom and portability of a physical key, like a key to your home or car makes a ton of sense.

                Passkeys are based on and supported by the FIDO alliance.

                https://fidoalliance.org/passkeys/

                • QuarterSwede@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  You don’t need a subscription as you well know since you know what they’re based on. And I meant FIDO physical keys as you were alluding to. Why would I ever want another device to use with a device that already has biometric auth? That last a barrier of entry that’s too high for most people.

  • A_A@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    the U.S. and other countries “around the world”

    meaning, for those of us living on other planets, we are completely safe … such a relief ! /s

    • IllNess@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      It’s best to say around the world just so who ever is reading it doesn’t think it region specific.

      For example, they could say “the U.S. and other countries in the western hemisphere.”

      • A_A@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        How do you like : “worldwide (including self centered U.S.A.)” 🤣 ?

        • IllNess@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          The other way works better since National Public Data is based in Florida and because of the name of the company. If it said “International” instead of “National” the readers would assume it is international data.

          Based on the location, name of the company, and the breach mentioning social security numbers, stating the US first is the most logical.

  • solrize@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    There are only 1 billion SSNs possible with 9 digits, and at most around 350M living people who have them (the US population). This breach is international but SSN is a US thing.

    • catloaf@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Do TINs overlap with SSNs? Because businesses and non-citizen taxpayers have TINs instead of SSNs, but they’re used just the same.

    • JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      9 digit social security number specifically might be, but a unique number tied to you that is often used as identification when it really shouldn’t isn’t, it’s a shitshow that has been implemented in many countries around the world.
      The Finnish version was called an SSN originally for example, though now its a “henkilötunnus”, personal identity code.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_identification_number

    • floofloof@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      And not all 9-digit numbers are used, so there are fewer than a billion. It sucks when organizations store them because the search space is so small it’s relatively easy to unhash them in a stolen database.

      • prime_number_314159@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        A lot of businesses use the last 4 digits separately for some purposes, which means that even if it’s salted, you are only getting 110,000 total options, which is trivial to run through.

  • Ebby@lemmy.ssba.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Alrighty, brainstorming time people. If you could write some practical laws, what protections do we need to stop these from happening.

    I’m thinking 3 categories: Reporting, oversight, and accountability.

    Reporting: all entities holding personally identifiable information (PII) must reach out once every 12 months. This hopefully unveils seedy brokers relying on obscurity. Maybe a policy to postpone notification up to 5 years (something like that) may be available as opt-in.

    Oversight: targets of PII have oversight of what is collected/used. Sensitive information may be purged permanently upon request.

    Accountability: set minimum fines for types of data stored. This monetary risk can then be calculated and factored into business operations. Unnecessary data would be a liability and worth purging.

    • Telorand@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Oversight: I would add a mandatory security audit annually, that they have to pay for, and which occurs during a given quarter at random (so you can’t “put on your best face” for a single day).

      The security audit cost is partially subsidized if they agree to a second audit 6-9 months after the first (tax funded).

      Accountability: I would add Prison time as a minimum penalty for the CEO and CIO, and the punitive damages must be a percentage of their profits (no flat rates), which is in addition to any compensatory damages awarded to plaintiffs. The penalty shall be used to help pay for future audits.

    • SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      How about a government-sponsored, non-profit authentication service? That is, it should be impossible to get a loan, open a line of credit, or anything else in somebody’s name, without the lending institution verifying that it’s actually on behalf of the named individual. Eliminate the security-through-obscurity technique of using bits of easily-leaked personal information as a poor substitute for actual authentication.

      I mean, (as a comparative example) I have to go through an OAuth2 consent dialog to connect a third-party app to my email account, yet somebody can saddle me with huge debts based on knowing a 9-digit number that just about everybody knows? It’s the system that’s broken, tightening up the laws on PII is just a band-aid.

      • Dave.@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        The US system is broken. I have a tax file number in Australia, which is the broad equivalent of a US SSN, and you know what someone can do with it if they also have my name and DOB? Fuck-all, except file my taxes for me, because you can’t use it as an identifier anywhere else than the Australian tax office.

        If I want a loan or a credit card or to open a bank account or any number of things , I need enough verifiable documents including photo ID to satisfy the other party that I am really them. Basically it’s a points system where any form of government photo ID gives you about 80 points and any other item of identifiable data gives you 10-20 points and usually you have to clear 100 points to be “identified”.

        So my passport plus my driver’s licence is enough. My driver’s licence plus my non photo ID government Medicare card or my official original copy of my birth certificate is enough. My driver’s licence and two bank or credit cards is enough. About 5 or 6 things like my birth certificate, electricity bills in my name or local government rates notices and bank cards is sometimes enough, although photo ID from somewhere is usually required, or you need a statutory declaration from someone in good standing saying that you are who you say you are.

        This kind of thing, while slightly more inconvenient, requires a number of physical items that can’t be easily stolen en-masse. I carry enough of them in my wallet that I can do anything I need to do, as my driver’s licence provides photo ID. People who don’t drive or have a passport can scrape together enough bits and pieces to usually get by.

        So it’s time for a change. But it doesn’t have to involve technology or a huge shift in the way of doing things. It just requires a points system similar to what I describe. Whether the US can effect that change now with the millions of systems that rely on a SSN for a trivial key in a database in some small retailer somewhere, I don’t know.

        • catloaf@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          That’s basically how it works in the US too. For example, for a form I-9, Employment Eligibility Verification, you need a passport, OR both proof of identity and proof of citizenship: https://www.uscis.gov/i-9-central/form-i-9-acceptable-documents

          It’s similar for stuff like state drivers’ licenses.

          The thing is, a federal domestic ID is all but prohibited. We have to have passports for international travel, but too many people are against federal ID because of “muh privacy”, even though it means we just end up misusing SSNs and companies like this one compensate by collecting multiple data points on each person.

      • Brkdncr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        This so much. In fact, go a step further and have a few competing auth services, with some regulatory oversight for managing that much pii.

    • RegalPotoo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Ok, bit of an outlandish idea, but how about something like:

      • Decree that information about a person is the property of that person, and therefore cannot be possessed without compensation. Think of it like intellectual property, but for your personal information
      • Set a standard royalty - say $0.05/year - that must be paid to the owner of that information for as long as that information is held. This forms an incentive to not hold information you don’t need, and gives visibility to all the places that are now forced to contact you every year to pay you the royalty
      • Places where you have an explicit contractual relationship with (utilities, banks, …) could have a clause to set the royalty at $0.00, but this can’t be extended to third parties - strong incentive not to transfer information to third parties
      • Unauthorised transfer or loss of information could be considered IP theft, and result in significant civil penalties
      • Ebby@lemmy.ssba.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Wow, you just reminded me of a data use policy I wrote up when I was young and sent a data broker after a security breach!

        They laughed at me.

        You and I think alike here.

  • /home/pineapplelover@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I tried freezing my credit but I think transunion and equifax wouldn’t let me create an account for some reason. Asking me to call them. Anybody else running into the same issue?

    • return2ozma@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I know Ticketmaster just sent out millions of “sorry we got hacked, freeze your credit for free with this code” letters. Maybe they’re struggling to keep up with demand.

    • ohlaph@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I did previously and had to wait until a weekday to talk to someone. It was a huge pain. Fuck those agencies.

      • cm0002@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Fuck those companies, they’d prefer that you thought of them as agencies because it makes them appear to be at least affiliated with the government.

        They’re not, they are private companies through and through

    • UselesslyBrisk@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Are you proxying or using a VPN to access their site. I often see IP blocks, even if that proxy is a simple socks proxy to a VPS i own. Many VPS subnets are blocked/restricted wholesale, as are many of the big VPN endpoint ips.

  • xthexder@l.sw0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    How did this company leak 2.9 billion people’s info, including SSNs, when the population of the US is only ~350M?

    Is “National Public Data” collecting info on everyone internationally? So many questions…

    • CluelessLemmyng@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      When applying to a US government position with a certain security clearance, they will do background checks of you, your family and extended family, if need be.

      And I’m sure that can be the case for any employer who needs background checks. That being said, I also suspect some of these people in the database are dead.

    • HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I just assume ssn is for a us audience and its worlwide with equivalent numbers but who knows. I mean there are only 8 bil on the planet so thats like everyone except maybe china, india, and africa