• Aceticon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago
      • Tests the waters
      • Finds it far too close to boiling point
      • Loudly claims “I have no plan to get in there!”
    • Angry_Autist (he/him)@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I am so fucking tired of this era of rampant consumer abuse. So. Fucking. Tired.

      They test us and test us and test us until we are so exhausted that one of their bullshit tests goes through and becomes an industry standard and now everyone except a tiny handful of ridiculously rich people are slightly worse off.

      Repeat ad enshittificatum.

      • Snapz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        And any “consumer victory” just means after an exhaustive fight, they’ll still just wait 5-10 news cycles and do the bad thing anyway. It’s republicans modified gish gallop playbook.

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    The problem is that companies talk to two sets of people and they both want to hear different things.

    Users, who want to hear that they’re making a new mouse that costs $5 and lasts forever and gives you a blowjob, and shareholders, who want a $50 a month subscription mouse that harvests the users organs while they’re at it.

    And it’s the CEO’s job to keep both of those people just unhappy enough to stick around.

    • pyre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      i think users just want a functioning mouse that doesn’t fall apart in months.

  • rustyricotta@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    But they’ll implement a one time fee to change your dpi, and then a few years after that it’ll be subscription.

    • reddit_sux@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      That is the reason why they r pushing for a subscription. If everyone who wants a mouse have a mouse how will the poor company earn money. How will the billionaire buy another yacht.

  • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    So it sounds like they did have plans, or at least ideas, for it but are now backtracking after the 100% deserved backlash.

    • Snapz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Still 1000% have those plans, they are just going to get quiet about them externally for a bit longer now.

    • HRDS_654@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      The new CEO had the beginning of an idea in an interview. The interviewer tried to push back while still keeping the interview going, but it became messy real quick.

      • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        If that’s the new CEO’s first idea, good luck, Logitech.

        Patel: I’m going to ask this very directly. Can you envision a subscription mouse?

        Faber: Possibly.

        • HRDS_654@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          It was so bad Nilay Patel had to apologize (semi-seriously) about causing a news cycle about a mouse.

      • DxK@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Same thing happened earlier this year with Wendy’s new CEO. His brilliant plan to make a name for himself was rolling out dynamic pricing. After days of well deserved backlash Wendy’s had to come out and walk it back while insisting they had never planned to use this to do lunch/dinner surge pricing.

        • pirat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Isn’t that what pizzerias and such often do, though, to get more customers in throughout the day? Where I live, a pizza for lunch is often like 20-40% cheaper than a pizza for dinner, and I think that’s actually alright.

    • Eager Eagle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      every company brainstorms at some point and come up with a few good and a lot of bad ideas;

      it doesn’t make it any closer to being a reality, the only difference is that this was made public.

      • sunzu@kbin.run
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        They were running it by to see if the host will accept the parasite. They will be back folks

        • ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          We have subscription services in cars now.

          I’m betting it’ll happen either way.

          It’s a fucking stupid future.

          • frunch@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            Exactly–and someone had to make the unpopular decision to announce it and weather the first round of criticisms. They also will be the first to profit from said stupid idea when they roll it out and the dumbs line up to buy it for fomo reasons or whatever

            • AntY@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              And this is one reason why I hate modern cars. But then again, there’s no alternative, and that sucks.

                • AntY@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  Maybe for now, but there’s fewer and fewer around. In ten-twenty years time it will be hard to find a 90s car with reasonable mileage.

              • seang96@spgrn.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 month ago

                Looks like tesla offers a premium subscription for most things and a separate one for the fancy cruise control… So I assume you have an old model or your being a troll?

    • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      They were just throwing it out to gauge reaction. They won’t give up on the idea just yet.

  • 👍Maximum Derek👍@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Sort of like how excited Wendy’s was to offer surge pricing, until 2 days later when they suddenly had “no plans to ever implement surge pricing, what’re yall talkin’ 'bout?”

  • JDPoZ@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Ah yes, the ol’ “joking about a threesome” trick.

    “What?! Oh, no I mean… I was just joking, honey. I’d never do that… I mean unless…”

    • dustyData@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      That always reeks of so much insecurity to me. Just own up to it. If you are in a relationship, “sure, I would do a threesome, but only if you actively want it too and we both agreed on the person and what was allowed or forbidden”. Not in a relationship, “Sure, I would be down for a threesome as long as the desires and limits of all people involved are discussed before hand and accepted by all”. There, with that attitude there’s less risk of confusion or misunderstanding.

      • Empricorn@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Look, I’m not gay but if my girl wants to bang Andrew Garfield, we’re having a three-way. My only ground rule is no one is allowed to leave anyone else for Andrew Garfield. And that includes Andrew Garfield…

      • Ms. ArmoredThirteen@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Not sure why you’re getting down votes because this is the way. If you want something, be open and ask for consent. Just be okay with people saying no, too, and you’re good

      • JDPoZ@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Actually 100% agree. Was more about the meme than real life though.

        Communication, honesty, boundaries that are mutually agreed upon and respected is the sign of a healthy relationship… not any artificial external construct set by religion, peers, or some perceived “norm” from society.

        That being said, I couldn’t think of a more clever comparison to make. 😅

      • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Wow, a mythical rational adult talking about sexual topics in a mature fashion, that’s like a unicorn!

        But seriously, you’re right on the money. That’s how my wife and I started bringing people into our relationship, and now we have a throuple hahaha.

  • Canis_76@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    As shoddy as the QC has been lately, I’m sure they have their consumer base to worry about. I bought a gray lift ergo mouse. Left click stopped working properly after about 3 weeks. Bought a cheaper, legit 3-button with a wheel also. Adjustable, rechargeable cordless. Works wonderfully after a month.