• SplashJackson@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    15 days ago

    “I’m not interested in arguing” -someone who knows they’re in the wrong, but still holds the power

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      15 days ago

      Only trouble is Microsoft clearly doesn’t care about negative reviews of their applications, because they’ve been receiving negative reviews for years now.

      It’s not like you can even avoid using their products, personally you can install Linux but you’re probably going to still have to use a Windows device at work, and business is where they make most of their profit anyway.

      • IndustryStandard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        15 days ago

        They still have presence in for example the Play store. A review can cost little time to place, yet it can affect a lot. Though avoid mentioning certain words censored by the play store.

        • SynopsisTantilize@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          15 days ago

          Is “id rather take a shot to the back of the throat from Andy Dick, than be stuck using Microsoft Office” approved for the app store?

      • Zink@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        15 days ago

        Yeah, work is where they get you. I’m fortunate to be able to use Linux at work too, but the company is still paying for my M365 account which I use in a browser for meetings and communication.

      • nek0d3r@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        15 days ago

        It’s mildly entertaining at times to scroll through the reviews of the HEIF Image Extension in the Microsoft Store. Microsoft doesn’t care one bit how bad they are.

  • TarantulaFudge@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    16 days ago

    Microsoft has policy that prevents it from retaliatory actions against human rights violations. Court should rule Microsoft violated its own policies…

    • taladar@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      16 days ago

      prevents it from retaliatory actions against human rights violations

      They can’t retaliate if someone violates human rights?

      • taipan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        15 days ago

        They’re referencing what the second protester (Vaniya Agrawal) mentioned in her email:

        Know that Microsoft’s human rights statement prohibits retaliation against anyone who raises a human rights-related concern: Human rights statement | Microsoft CSR

        The Microsoft Global Human Rights Statement has a “Foundational principles” section that says:

        Our commitment to human rights defenders: Our commitment to respecting and advancing human rights includes respect and support for the work of human rights defenders around the world. Human rights defenders are people who, individually or with others, engage in activities and advocacy that contribute to the protection of human rights and the rule of law, good governance, tolerance, and diversity and inclusion. Human rights defenders face persistent physical, social, economic, and psychological threats. Microsoft does not tolerate threats, intimidation, retaliation, physical, legal or cyber-attacks against human rights defenders. This commitment extends to all human rights defenders, including those working on issues related to Microsoft and those exercising their rights of freedom of expression, association, and peaceful assembly, including to challenge or protest aspects of our own business.

        Microsoft is clearly declining to fulfill its commitment as it is written in its statement.

  • AwkwardBroccolli@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    16 days ago

    I am not worried about the firing part. This lady and her friends must have been added to the DHS list. They are going to deport her if she is on any visa or PR.

    • stabryen@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      16 days ago

      In terms of Microsoft suing her?

      I guess it would depend on her contract, as Microsoft do profit from war so I would doubt a libel type case would get far.

          • pivot_root@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            15 days ago

            More importantly, with what money? Mega corporations can afford to draw out lawsuits until the end of time (or until the judge gets annoyed), but individuals can’t.

            • Saleh@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              15 days ago

              If she has a lawsuit i would be happy to bolster her legal fund and i am sure many other people too.

          • Laurel Raven@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            15 days ago

            The fact that it’s in retaliation for her speaking out about human rights violations, when they have a clear policy against retaliating against employees who speak out about human rights violations

      • DontMakeMoreBabies@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        14 days ago

        Shhhhh… Get out of here with your nuance. Let them screech about the bad private company violating the First Amendment.

        It makes the monkeys feel better.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          14 days ago

          Let them screech about the bad private company violating the First Amendment.

          How many billions of dollars in government contracts do you need to receive before the line blurs? Microsoft might as well be a subsidiary of the Federal Bureaucracy, given the role it plays in national security, infrastructure, and data management. The US government is its biggest client by far.

        • skisnow@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          14 days ago

          That was the opposite of nuance. It was pedantry that deliberately missed the point.

      • SasquatchBanana@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        14 days ago

        It doesn’t seem they are using free speech in the same sense as the American first amendment (they may not be from the USA). But i would argue that if companies want to play politics, run countries, and be that integrated in people’s lives then free speech as a concept should extend to companies.

        • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          14 days ago

          As a not-American we don’t say we have freedom of speech, we say we have protected speech and that is more inline with what you want

  • wise_pancake@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    16 days ago

    the email to Aboussad reads. “It is also concerning that you have not apologized to the company, and in fact you have shown no remorse for the effect that your actions have had and will have.”

    Obviously there were going to fire these employees, especially the one who gave notice then did this.

    But why the fuck would anyone be like “yOu DiDn’T eVeN aPoLoGiZe To ThE cOmPaNy”? That’s the stupidest god damn thing I’ve heard since “Liberation Day”

    • seeigel@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      15 days ago

      But why the fuck would anyone be like “yOu DiDn’T eVeN aPoLoGiZe To ThE cOmPaNy”?

      Frame the debate. MS doesn’t have to justify their profiteering if they can talk about the employee. The attention span of the public is limited.

    • GnuLinuxDude@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      15 days ago

      Hey, when’s the last time you showed remorse to your multi-trillion market cap employer? Next you’re gonna tell me something really outrageous like you didn’t even take a swear an oath of fealty to them.

    • FourWaveforms@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      15 days ago

      That email was almost certainly written by lawyers with the intention of supporting MS in court, should it come down to that.

      • shalafi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        15 days ago

        Bingo. Lots of stupid things at this level boil down to legal protection. You’ll see it everywhere once you learn and look.

        • parody@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          15 days ago

          “Lucky we’re not countersuing! Oh the damages you are certain to be causing in the futureeee, the burns”

          Actually now that I think about it maybe this was a multimillion dollar protest. The headlines have been published for and wide. I bet a few people spent more time feeling guilty than working right after as well - imagine one of them quitting. Still somewhat hard to believe it would lose them contracts but perhaps there will be potential customers who want to avoid connection with Microsoft until this blows over.

      • binom@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        15 days ago

        that makes sense. i hate the fact that such a blatant play at covering your bases could hold up in any court. no matter the legal fineprint, it takes two functioning braincells to realise what’s going on here

  • supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    15 days ago

    Fuck you Microsoft, if I wasn’t already done with you for completely enshittifying your operating system, I would DEFINITELY be done with you for this.

    Fuck off and continue to become a Kodak or Yahoo or other still existing washout company that totally lost the plot.

      • RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        15 days ago

        What message was that? They work for Microsoft a company that has had DOD contracts for at least the last 25-30 years.

        They were a war profiteer when this worker got their gig. Why is it a problem now?

        • underwire212@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          15 days ago

          Problems can be ongoing or increase in severity. Just because it’s been an issue for a while doesn’t mean it’s too late for change.

          Also, some people don’t have the luxury to choose an ethical employer (if they even exist).

        • IndustryStandard@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          15 days ago

          Direct participation in the military systems for a genocide is a tad further than the military industrial complex.

          The message is that people participating in genocide will not be made at the very least very uncomfortable for doing so.

          • RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            15 days ago

            They had IDF contracts for decades as well. Seriously if they had a problem with this and this is not a PR stunt by this person they are choosing an odd time to make this statement.

            • Shardikprime@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              15 days ago

              Literally this

              It’s like they are signaling to the world how virtuous they are

              A kind of high ground moral messaging if you will

            • IndustryStandard@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              15 days ago

              An active mass genocide is an odd time to make a statement?

              Microsoft lied about not supplying the IDF military cloud in the past.

              And AI is a far more direct contribution to genocide than excel support.

              Plenty of reasons to do it now. And better now than tomorrow.

      • AwkwardBroccolli@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        16 days ago

        I am pretty sure ICE and DHS are enroute to arrest her and deport her to El Salvador. Fucking gestappo c**ts. This is exactly what Rashida Tlaib, Jill Stein and Kshama Sawant wanted.