• Baguette@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Google no longer has the motto of “dont be evil”, I wonder why…

  • wjrii@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    This is a big deal, but just a reminder that this is the District (trial) court, so the next step would be the Circuit Court of Appeals, followed by an appeal to the Supreme Court. There may be some intriguing injunctions that come out of this, but we’re years away from a final disposition.

    For the curious, this one came out of the DC Circuit, informally known to be the most technically and administratively savvy circuit, as it deals with a LOT of nitty gritty stuff coming out of Federal agencies.

    • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I was about to comment that this is going to be appealed, and unless something changes with SCOTUS, my money is in it being reversed to some degree.

      • adarza@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        depends on when it hits the supreme court, for sure.

        didn’t someone just say google was ‘very bad’ and should be ‘shut down’? …someone that helped stack the court to its current composition?

    • Thebeardedsinglemalt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Clarence Thomas is hiding behind a tree in a yellow suit rubbing his hands together for all the shit Google is gonna give to him to get this immediately overturned…

  • Pika@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Oh boy, can’t wait for this one to be thrown out by our totally not rigged, definitly for the people supreme Court.

    • Patch@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      What with Trump recently declaring (in his usual completely coherent and not at all deranged manner) that Google Are Bad, the Supreme Court might not necessarily be feeling so keen to help out on this one.

    • werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      The supremes will rule fairly! …and in the case of people vs the Google, how do you find these 3 million dollars in a quad motor Tesla?

      Innocent your supremacist! Innocent!

    • bitwolf@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Trump is mad at Google so the Republicans want it. So Supreme Court will likely rule 6/3 in favor.

  • candybrie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    You don’t need to bring your library. Having your library split between multiple platforms isn’t a big deal and most people do it. You just don’t give them any more money.

    People didn’t not buy DVDs because they had a library of VHSs.

    • Jarix@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Uh yes many of us did not buy dvds because we had vhs and couldn’t afford to switch to a new medium.

      Just like if we had a dvd collection we didn’t go to HDDVD / Blueray. Many people never got into Blu-ray at all

      But eventually we had to and now we have issues with drm and losing purchased digital media on streaming services

      • candybrie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I’m not talking about replacing your VHS collection but buying DVDs in addition. You would still watch both. Maybe buying a DVD player was a barrier. But it wasn’t that you owned VHS.

        • Jarix@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Yes it was for many many people. You seem to find this hard to believe.

          Blueray/HDDvd was out before the majority of people stopped using their vhs collections.

          As tvs went digital and high def it took a long time for people to care enough to upgrade/replace

          • candybrie@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            Ok then switch to streaming. My point was just that just because you have a VHS collection doesn’t mean you can’t get media in another way and still use your VHS collection. And most people would use both while they transitioned. Throwing out all your VHSs for the hot new thing isn’t something a lot of people did. Or throwing out all your DVDs because streaming is a thing. People aren’t restricted to one thing.

          • Queue@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Blueray/HDDvd was out before the majority of people stopped using their vhs collections.

            Do you have a citation on this? Personally I was DVD only until I got an Xbox One, which could play Blurays.

            And we got DVDs because my brother marketed getting a PS2 to my family as a DVD player and a Video Game system, as one of those alone cost the same as a PS2 at the time.

            And we gave up VHS tapes long before, as space is at a premium for us. Worse quality, worse features, more work to rewatch something, bigger format, etc.

  • prosp3kt@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Maybe we should not let companies to work in a lot of areas. For example Amazon, SaaS IaaS Paas Ecommerce, ARM processors, among others. Maybe we should contain megadiversified enterprises??

  • fne8w2ah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Might not do much for the upcoming Manifest v3 doomsday but at least the current government recognises the ills of big tech as it currently stands.

    • Jarix@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      But is this just tactics to win an election? Will they go the distance on any trust issue, or is it all vapour?

  • candybrie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    My point is people still used that VHSs. They just also bought DVDs. For most people, you didn’t only use one. I think most people went through a period where they used both.

    • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      America needs to pick up the old ways and start going after monopolies with a sledge hammer to break them into tiny pieces again.

      and pass laws that don’t let them pull an ATT and buy back all their fragments and recongeal into an even bigger, more dangerous monopoly than it was before like some kinda fucked up liquid metal terminator of capitalism.

  • HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    we have so many freaking monopolies now a days. we really need to keep companies from owning so much. bring back the media limits and no company should be able to own multiple areas of healthcare and such.