Gregor@gregtech.eu to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 1 month agoC memegregtech.euimagemessage-square18fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up11arrow-down1imageC memegregtech.euGregor@gregtech.eu to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 1 month agomessage-square18fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareSpaceNoodle@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 month agoThis is why I only allocate on the stack
minus-squarexmunk@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 month agoPeople who are enthusiastic about using pointers in C++ are doing it wrong. Never use a pointer when you can get away with a reference.
minus-squareKindaABigDyl@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 month agoFor C++, yes. But “reference” is just a way of using the pointer when it comes to C
minus-squareSpaceNoodle@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 month agoSure, but that’s technically allocation-agnostic either way.
minus-squareSpaceNoodle@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 month agoThis guy gets it Static allocation for the SIL ratings
This is why I only allocate on the stack
Stack overflow intensifies
People who are enthusiastic about using pointers in C++ are doing it wrong. Never use a pointer when you can get away with a reference.
For C++, yes. But “reference” is just a way of using the pointer when it comes to C
Sure, but that’s technically allocation-agnostic either way.
I only use the registers.
Based nasa compliant engineer
This guy gets it
Static allocation for the SIL ratings