• Thrashy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    A combination of resting on their laurels during AMD’s lost decade, and failure to retain competitive process technology during the extended gestation and ultimate failure of their non-EUV 10nm node. The arrogance of taking their foot off the gas and aiming nobody would ever catch back up to them backfired hard.

    • Buffalox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      This is not entirely fair though, they spend more than $10 billion over 10 years trying to compete with Arm, but the effort failed despite they had the production process advantage at the time. To get a better picture the the Intel effort, they spend more on the effort than the entire Arm revenue in that period!
      But Noohh ISA doesn’t matter they say. 😂 🤣

      • Wispy2891@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        You mean the decade where they tried to make arm processors and gave up just before smartphones became popular or the decade where they tried and failed to make x86 processors for smartphones ?

        • Buffalox@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          The decade they tried to make X86 compete with Arm on smartphones.
          I have changed “with Arm” to “against Arm” which I suppose could have caused the doubt.