I regret nothing. Say what you want.

Edit: I just saw the two typos. If you find them, you’re welcome to keep them.

  • killeronthecorner@lemmy.worldEnglish
    0·
    2 days ago

    I coded several of my early mobile app releases entirely in gedit. Good times.

    I sometimes forget how good we have it now. I wrote those apps around 2012 and the DX for the platforms was basically non-existent. Virtually every platform had shit documentation, shit version management, a shit IDE with minimal refactoring features, a shitty debugging experience, and everything felt like it was being botched together by 3 guys in their spare time.

    It’s incredible now that we have things like hot reloading. You can literally save a change and BAM it’s on the screen seconds later. On native platforms no less. Astounding.

    • Rikudou_Sage@lemmings.worldEnglish
      0·
      2 days ago

      Pff, real programmers use butterflies. We open our hands and let the delicate wings flap once. The disturbance ripples outward, changing the flow of the eddy currents in the upper atmosphere. These cause momentary pockets of higher-pressure air to form, which acts as lenses that deflect incoming cosmic rays, focusing them to strike the drive platter and flip the desired bit.

  • Black616Angel@discuss.tchncs.de
    0·
    3 days ago

    And then there is a colleague who programs in Notepad++ directly on the test server and then just copies his code to prod.

    (yes, he works alone on that project)

    • IndustryStandard@lemmy.world
      0·
      2 days ago

      I recommend “micro” which is like Nano but uses modern shortcuts. Making it a terminal editor which feels more like using notepad than something esoteric.

    • JackbyDev@programming.devEnglish
      0·
      2 days ago

      I used to copy code into nano over ssh. Then I randomly tried pasting the server address in my file browser and it connected over SFTP. This was ages ago. I was using Crunchbang Linux, maybe around 2011 or so.

  • chad@sh.itjust.works
    0·
    3 days ago

    Learned C++ by using gedit on the Sun machines in my college’s computer lab in 2007. They were decommissioned shortly after I graduated.

  • LovableSidekick@lemmy.worldEnglish
    0·
    3 days ago

    At one of my jobs around 2010 there was a dev in the office who wrote all his code in Notepad. When I joined the staff they were still using Classic ASP. My job was to help them (finally) migrate to ASP.Net. He intended to develop .Net apps in Notepad rather than learn how to use VS. I got laid off due to cutbacks and never found out what kind of luck he had wit dat.

  • NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone
    0·
    3 days ago

    At uni I did a lot of my Java coursework in notepad, then I’d have to take it into a computer lab on a floppy, tar it and upload it to a unix terminal so it could be emailed to the professor. Java syntax with only the command line compiler is not fun.

  • Takumidesh@lemmy.world
    0·
    3 days ago

    Vim and emacs are text editors.

    Vs code is a code editor (but really it’s also just a text editor)

    Maybe they mean IDEs like visual studio?

    I’ve never really heard it called a coding GUI before.

    • CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world
      0·
      3 days ago

      Vim (and NeoVim) are as much coding environments as VS or JetBrains. The difference is in the defaults.

    • barsoap@lemm.ee
      0·
      3 days ago

      So an IDE is a code editor that ships with an LSP server, not just an LSP interface? (Doesn’t have to be LSP as such but “stuff that an LSP server does”).

      • Fonzie!@ttrpg.network
        0·
        3 days ago

        For me a web app IDE includes a DB manger, HTML previewer, etc.

        A text editor edits text, an IDE is an Environment that Integrates Development tools.

      • Takumidesh@lemmy.world
        0·
        3 days ago

        I would say that an IDE is something that includes build/run tools integrated into it. Everything else is just a text editor. (But that’s just my opinion of course)

        To expand on my point, I don’t think it makes sense to call vs code an integrated development environment if it doesn’t actually have the environment integrated.

        Visual studio and idea would be examples of IDEs, they actually have all of the tools and frameworks needed to run the languages they were built for out of the box.

        You can’t run node or python out of the box with just vs code for example, without their respective tooling, all vscode can do is edit the code and editing code is not functionally different from editing any other text.

        So I maintain that both vim and vscode are text editors and not IDEs

        • barsoap@lemm.ee
          0·
          3 days ago

          I’d say build and run tools are pretty integrated into vim. Type :mak and there you go, it’s not like vs studio would be a single process either.

    • d00ery@lemmy.world
      0·
      3 days ago

      Vim and emacs usually run in the terminal and require keyboard commands to complete actions.

      A GUI IDE like vscode or pycharm has mouse driven menus and buttons, although of course it’s possible to use keyboard commands.

      That to me is the difference. Personally, I use vim mod with pycharm and some messy hybrid combination of vim commands and ctrl + ?

      • Shareni@programming.dev
        0·
        2 days ago

        Vim and emacs usually run in the terminal and require keyboard commands to complete actions.

        It is most certainly not usual to run Emacs in the terminal.

        although of course it’s possible to use keyboard commands.

        And you can use Emacs with a mouse.

      • Takumidesh@lemmy.world
        0·
        3 days ago

        Vs code has no integrated environment though, it’s just a text editor that supports plugins, you still need to install python or node or .net or Java or gcc, etc.

        As far as vim requiring keyboard commands, that’s really only the case if you leave mouse mode off

        set mouse=a

        And of course, to muddy the water further, we have tools like https://helix-editor.com/ which, more closely approximate vs code, while happening to live in a terminal.

        I maintain that in order to qualify as an IDE and not a glorified text editor, you must be able to, out of the box, without external dependencies, run and build the code it was built for (idea/visual studio) otherwise it’s not very integrated, and I don’t think you need to have nice graphics for that qualification.

        • null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
          0·
          3 days ago

          Guy this is just semantics.

          If you want to uphold a specific definition of what constitutes an IDE that’s fine, but what does it matter if others consider plugins to be integration.

        • d00ery@lemmy.world
          0·
          3 days ago

          Interesting, I didn’t know that about VSCode.I’ve used it briefly and I must have always installed some default plugins to make it work with python!

          The only query I’d have on that definition of IDE is that they all require an external compiler or JIT interpreter to execute code, because the versions of the compilers changes so frequently it’d be crazy to release an ‘all included’ IDE. (The old MS Visual Basic is an example of ‘all included’)

          But yeah, pycharm or phpstorm are “ready to run” bar the code compiler or interpreter, I don’t have to open a terminal or something to run code I’ve written.