cm0002@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 days agoMicrosoft's quantum computing claims slammed as 'fraudulent'www.windowscentral.comexternal-linkmessage-square61fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1external-linkMicrosoft's quantum computing claims slammed as 'fraudulent'www.windowscentral.comcm0002@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 days agomessage-square61fedilink
minus-squareTreczoks@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·3 days agoOf course. Not a single quantum computer has done anything but test programs and quantum-specific benchmarks. Until a quantum computer finally does something a normal computer regularly does, but faster, we should simply ignore this area.
minus-squareLv_InSaNe_vL@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·3 days ago until it’s better we should simply ignore this That seems like a strange comment to make. How will it get better if we don’t spend the time and effort to make it better?
minus-squaredaniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·2 days agoMany people in lemmy is highly primitivist and tech conservatives. Meaning that they don’t actually want any technological progress.
minus-squareTreczoks@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·2 days agoThe idea is not to have three worthless announcements per week. They can get better all they want, and come back once they have tangible results.
minus-squareImgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·3 days agoWith quantum computing if you ignore it you are simultaneously not ignoring it?
Of course. Not a single quantum computer has done anything but test programs and quantum-specific benchmarks. Until a quantum computer finally does something a normal computer regularly does, but faster, we should simply ignore this area.
That seems like a strange comment to make. How will it get better if we don’t spend the time and effort to make it better?
Many people in lemmy is highly primitivist and tech conservatives. Meaning that they don’t actually want any technological progress.
The idea is not to have three worthless announcements per week. They can get better all they want, and come back once they have tangible results.
With quantum computing if you ignore it you are simultaneously not ignoring it?
I don’t think so, but yes.