• Caedarai@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Well, because it won’t be signed by a trusted CA for that task. Like if CAs had a category of certificate issuance that applied here (the standardisation issue) then it would be easy to spot a fake (which wouldn’t be correctly signed). Alternatively, you could take the European approach of having everything government related (like public street parking, though Europe mostly uses apps for that, not signed QR codes) rely on government entities and those in turn on a national set of government CAs.

      • Aux@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 hours ago

        That doesn’t make any sense. How would you know if something should or should not be signed? You wouldn’t.

        • Caedarai@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 hours ago

          If it becomes standard for public parking to be signed, everyone would know. If payment QR codes in general start being signed, your payment app might even know. Lastly there could even be signage by the code to help novices.

          • Aux@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 hours ago

            The point of a code is to not have an app in the first place. Thus there’s no way to validate it.