• MisshapenDeviate@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        https://www.merriam-webster.com/grammar/fewer-vs-less

        Essentially, fewer is normally used for discrete numbers of things (e.g. “fewer apples”, “fewer boats”, or “fewer cops”) while less is used for amounts (e.g. “less water”, “less sand”, or “less money”).

        As noted in the above link, there are exceptions. However, the exceptions listed are all with “than” or “or” added. Specifically, it’s pointing put that while “fewer items” is correct, “3 items or less” is also considered correct.

        In the case of the sign, it is referring to the specific number of officers in the city, so it should use “fewer”. Does it matter? No, not really. Why did I bother saying anything? I got a chance to rep grammar and quote Stannis Baratheon at the same time.

      • nova@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        It just feels so petty. Not a single person reading “less cops” was confused by its meaning. I get fighting against misuse of your/you’re, its/it’s, etc. because they can make things harder to read. Fewer and less, though, have the exact same underlying meaning (a reduction).

        • Rinox@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Can we at least stop allowing people to use ‘of’ instead of ‘have’?

          It doesn’t make any sense and I need to read the sentence twice to understand what they’re saying.