• KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 hour ago

    technology has the potential to make life so much better, there are two problems.

    Tech that makes life better, usually doesn’t create much value. Because it’s either, already been created, and if it has, it’s probably enshittified by now.

    Go use open source FOSS tech, it’s great. Contribute to the improvement of society by not using terrible technology and begin using good technology, it’s free!

    • InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 hours ago

      People forget that technology is agnostic to morals and ideals. Which is a big part of why I support FOSS. It is tech with goals that do aim for accessibility and making the world better. I am not a huge donator as I don’t make much money, nor can I code well, but I donate and contribute where I can.

  • JackbyDev@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I had an Amazon bot lie to me. I told it some item didn’t show up and I wanted a replacement. It said it would send one and it would show up in my orders. It never did. So I requested a refund later. So tedious.

    • comfydecal@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 hours ago

      You see, it actually did still save you time from finding a local shop that sells it and interacting with your neighbor

  • ricecooker@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I think this headline is slightly misleading. Here are some better ones:

    • Reclaiming Humanity in the Age of Overbearing Technology
    • When Convenient Tech Becomes a Burden: A Call for Human-Centric Design
    • How Modern Tech Erodes Human Interaction
    • qarbone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      This is weird take on an op-ed. OP didn’t alter the title. The only ways I can conceive of a headline being “misleading” is when it declares a falsity (this doesn’t; it’s an opinion) or doesn’t match the content of the titled text (this doesn’t; it matches the text).

  • scarabic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Some parts of life have gotten massively easier. The other day I called my pharmacy to delay my next prescription refill because I still have pills. I was able to do this entirely through voice interaction with an automated system. Huzzah. I get texts when my scrips are about to be filled or ready, and reminders if I don’t pick them up for a while. I can also see this info on demand in an app if I want. What’s not to like?

    My entire medical group runs on an app now. I can make appointments with my doctor, see the documentation from prior visits, pay bills, see test results…

    Oh but boo hoo this author had to download an app to order a drink. First world problems…

  • Xed@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Technology absolutely helps advance science and helps the disabled, It’s greedy fucks that destroyed good tech

    • comfydecal@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Yeah I think blanket statements either way are misguided. Some tech does help the disabled, other tech makes their lives much more difficult. It’s like any other tool, when it’s used at scale by something aiming for optimizing profit it will have terrible side effects

  • FIbynight@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I saw the writing on the wall when we started getting itunes updates that no one wanted.

  • x4740N@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I prefer the saying “technology is a tool and a tool can be used for good or evil” or something like that

    You can use a hammer to hammer nails or to injure someone

    Technology can make the world better if its in the right hands for example open source hardware & software

  • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Anytime I have to replace a device I find it incredibly frustrating. It certainly seems like technology is regressing. I’ve had the same phone since 2016 because nothing I’ve looked at has enough of it has to replace it and doesn’t offer anything better to make up for those deficiencies. My mouse recently developed an issue that had me looking at potential replacements and again almost nothing currently available matches it or was even close. I found two that were potentially not a downgrade and one of those had awful reviews. Instead I’m just buying the part to fix it and hopefully I’ll be able to keep limping it along for the foreseeable future. Same goes for my car. Nothing new that I’ve seen appeals to me. They’re all loaded down with infotainment bullshit that’s just a pain in the ass to deal with. Those were just 3 off the top of my head. At least with software you can usually find something open source that does what you want, but if it has to be manufactured by someone else you can forget about it.

    • Toribor@corndog.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 hours ago

      My mouse recently developed an issue that had me looking at potential replacements and again almost nothing currently available matches it or was even close.

      I used the exact same Logitech MX518 mouse from ~2009 until ~2020. Then I went through one every 9 months or so until they succumbed to same problems with the scrollwheel failing until I finally had to stop buying their crap.

      • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Yea, this one is actually a Logitch 602 I’ve had for years, and it’s my 3rd one after two warranty replacements so the build quality has always been questionable but I love the button layout on this mouse and the software is usually pretty good at doing what I want so I’m dreading having to replace it. There was apparently another similar one that came out a couple years ago but they don’t make them anymore and from what I was reading the quality was garbage too. I still have the one from the second time I replaced it through the warranty so I’m going to replace the problematic switches on it and see how that goes.

  • CriticalMiss@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 hours ago

    I kinda agree with the article, I genuinely think humanity peaked with the computer of the PS2 era. Or maybe it had something to do with the patriot act. Just feels like after that things had gotten worse substantially

  • frezik@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Imagine VR so real that someone severely allergic to cats can know what it’s like to give one scritches and feel it purr. Imagine someone who is paraplegic knowing what it’s like to swim or climb a mountain. Now imagine how much money Mark Zuckerberg will make when it’s $22.95/month with ads and requires you to put in your Social Security Number.

  • OrteilGenou@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 hours ago

    I understand the complaint, but the big picture of tech has a ton of upside.

    Tech itself is not the issue. How it’s applied is the issue.

    Once tech takes hold, there is massive pressure to monetize the asset.

    That’s where this complaint lives. Amazing advance becomes ubiquitous, then two things inevitably occur. Companies are formed that apply the technology on unnecessary and unpopular ways (parking app is a perfect example) or the pressure to make more more MORE MONEY triggers the enshittification spiral, where “wow, you can print wirelessly now!?” becomes “my printer won’t take any cartridges but brand name, and I have to watch an unskippable 30-second ad every time I print now??!!!”

    It follows that as tech saturates our lives, the inevitability of enshittification will also saturate our lives.

    The year is 2044, you don’t feel old but the ticker is starting to skip several beats a day. Your doctor is forced to use the product at his disposal to help you, which is the PaceXMaker produced by the Tesla-Cola conglomerate. The device is a true miracle of modern science. The size of a fingernail, it pulses electricity into your heart in carefully measured bursts to support proper function of all valves, and ensures that any plaque is dissolved harmlessly away. Your iEye tracks the device status, and alerts you when it starts to run low on fuel, a proprietary enzyme designed by Tesla-Cola. When the iEye app notifies you that the enzyme is running low, simply crack open an ice cold, refreshing can of Tesla Cola Zero to refuel your device for another two hours. Need to sleep? We got you. Hook up the Tesla Cola Zero-Venous BeautyRest to your ArmDock (patent pending) for up to five hours of relaxing enzyme replenishment. You can remove the arm dock after you confirm six ad-watch minute credits on your iEye.

    Tesla-Cola: We Got You

    • FIbynight@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I would say Tech with a capital T includes not just physical or cloud tech, but the whole process, down to shitty Product Owners and business teams, delivery crap features to customers.

    • andros_rex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Transmetropolitan had in-dream advertising. I think you got it from breathing in some sort of gas when walking around in public.

      The most unrealistic thing about the Transmetropolitan series was the fact that Spider was able to make a living as a journalist.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Tech itself is not the issue. How it’s applied is the issue.

      At this point, I would argue that technology is the issue. Or, at least, the current iteration of it.

      Internal Combustion Engines, always-on internet connections, and digital financial systems are generating real physical hazards that stretch beyond their benefits. This isn’t just an issue of use. There is no “proper” method of employing - for instance - cryptocurrency or single-use plastics or a statewide surveillance network that doesn’t result in a degradation of quality of life for the population at large. To take a more dramatic angle, there’s no safe application of a nuclear bomb.

      When the iEye app notifies you that the enzyme is running low, simply crack open an ice cold, refreshing can of Tesla Cola Zero to refuel your device for another two hours. Need to sleep? We got you.

      Except this isn’t a technological innovation, its a Science Fantasy. iEye isn’t a real thing. Tesla Cola Zero isn’t a real thing. Not needing sleep isn’t a real thing. You’re not a cyborg and you will never be a cyborg.

      But the science fantasy is still having its own cost. People are making real material nationally-transformative (or de-transformative) decisions based on the fantastic promises we’ve been sold about Tomorrow. We’re underdeveloping our mass transit infrastructure and relying entirely too much on unregulated air travel to speed up travel. At the same time, we’re clinging to old bunker-fuel laden container ships and decimating the aquatic ecology, because we refuse to adapt proven nuclear powered shipping that’s over 60 years old at this point. We’re investing more and more and more money in digital surveillance and personal tracking. We’re off-loading our ability to collect and process information to unreliable digital tools (LLMs being only the latest in overhyped AI as a replacement for professionalized human labor). And then we’re trying to justify the bad decisions we make as a result by claiming secret wisdom inherent in machines.

      We’re eating our seed corn after being told technologists will eliminate our need to eat ever again.

      This is a direct result of technological developments we have made (or promised to make and failed to deliver) over the last twenty years. Revolutions in racial profiling, viral marketing, planned obsolescence, military expansionism, and genocide have not improved our quality of life in any material sense.

      The cow has not benefited from industrial agriculture. And the prole has not benefited from de-skilling of labor.