• Ziggurat@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    This actually a pretty interesting take.

    I see how it can work with experienced players ready for some experimental game, but indeed it’s not something I’ll do on another context for the following reason.

    I don’t know whey some people seems to strongly decorrelate the system from the rest of the game. The mechanic is a component of the game theme and mood and a good pairing Setting/System is important. To be cliché you’re not going to use D&D to play Chtulhu unless you want to do a dungeon crawling agaisnt Mi-go

    Many players don’t have a feeling about which game mechanic they can come with

    This kind of discussion works if you have a lot of time. If you’re young and plan to play until dawn no matter what, sure it’s fine. for a busy and married adult needing to have dinner with their SO and who plans to take the last train home to come back, you don’t want to loose time with these less important questions

  • Sunsofold@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    The point of having the system before you play is just letting everyone know what to expect on the G part of RPG so they can focus on the R and the P. It kills all momentum to stop and ask, ‘so what system do we want to use’ in the middle of the game. No system is perfect, but it cuts out a lot of work to just pick one and roll with it, homebrewing over the few holes that show up.

  • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    This sounds like a personal hell to me.

    I mean, it might work if your group is all kind of on the same wavelength to begin with. But if that’s the case, you could also easily start with a system you like and go from there instead of reinventing all the wheels.

    A lot of people have only really played D&D and its close relatives. I like to describe that in this metaphor: Imagine someone who has only every seen the lord of the rings movies. They’ve watched them over and over, both cinematic and directors cuts. They know all the lore and all the minutia. And then they sit down to write their own movie. Maybe a sci-fi space mystery to change things up. And this movie? it has horses. Because movies always have horses, don’t they? They’re in like every movie. So when the detective is stuck in the burning theater, his buddy should ride in on a horse and save him.

    So I 0%, maybe even some negative percent, want to have to sell a group on “RPGs don’t actually need six attributes” or “you don’t need to have separate rolls for to-hit and damage” for the first time in their lives.

    Secondly, most people are bad at design. Sorry. It kind of follows from sturgeon’s law (“90% of everything is crap”). Most people don’t set out to make crap, but it happens anyway. Most people firing from the hip are just not going to make good systems. Especially if, as above, they’ve only ever really played one kind of game. So, no, I don’t want to deal with the guy who’s like “On a natural 1 you should drop your sword” who doesn’t realize that, because fighter types make a lot more attack rolls, they’re going to drop their swords way more often than you’d expect of the archetype. I am reminded of an unhappy time in an old, bad, D&D game where I fruitlessly tried to explain effective HP to the wizard. (Since D&D 5e stops counting damage at 0, there are some weird interactions between initiative, healing, and damage.)

    Third, even if you avoid all of that, even if you have a group with a deep and wide knowledge of game design, you’re going to end up with an inelegant mess. Why does intimidating someone mean a simultaneous roll-off of increasingly large dice, but bluffing someone means drawing poker hands? Because those rules were added on different sessions, and Mike was really into poker and convinced people it would be cool. Wrestling someone you flip coins, but knife fighting you roll d4s. Sword fights use this complicated table Joe insisted would be fun, but magic is just a roll off. No thank you.

    I’d rather just play Fate, which is already pretty loose about how to interpret conflict and consequences.

    • BigSadDad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      I think you missed the point of the blog. It’s not “A guy makes a game” it’s “a group of friends make stuff up and a game is carved out of it”

      Which yeah I can understand not everyone likes that. You need some imagination, the willingness to try new things and generally be down for some chaos. For the rest of us it sounds like a fun way to just fool around with friends.

      • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        As I said, it sounds like my personal hell. I do not believe the average person is good at making up rules, and thus many bad outcomes are more likely.

        If the other people are proposing bad rules, it’s probably some combination of

        • Play with the bad rule and am annoyed
        • Try to convince them to change the rule, and that’s not fun
        • Don’t realize it’s a bad rule until it has unwanted consequences

        I really don’t want the game to grind to a halt because we realized mid session that the interaction of rules is making Bob super effective, and now we need to untangle this in a way that Bob won’t feel attacked and Alice won’t feel useless.

        If I just wanted to fool around with some friends, and we wanted to do an RPG, Fate is right there. It even encourages you to build on top of it.

        • BigSadDad@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          I think you… Don’t get it. You’re coming at this as a “My competitive ranked TTRPG where I play only optimal builds and make optimal actions won’t benefit from loose rules”

          Literally sitting down at a table with some beer and pretzels and just improv gaming is fun as hell. Not all the time but to shake things up? Sounds great.

          • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            This has nothing to do with builds. Fate, the game I said I’d play, doesn’t really have builds.

            This is all about not wanting to have to spend a lot of time arguing with people, or playing a game I don’t like. Those are the two most likely outcomes. People will propose bad rules, and we either argue or I suck it up. There are so many common ideas in RPGs that I really don’t enjoy, but are popular nonetheless. I don’t want to stop the game and argue that “save or die” kind of sucks, and if we kill Alex’s character now like that a. they’re probably going to be unhappy just look at their face and b. what are they going to do the rest of the night?

            (Or I’ll propose rules that won’t achieve the desired goals very well, because I’m also not such a good designer I can nail things on the first try)

            Maybe with some hypothetical spherical frictionless group of players that are all on the same page about rules and design it would be fun. But that doesn’t seem to exist in the real world. We live in a world where people go “Let’s use D&D for a game of political intrigue! Wait, why does the fighter barely have anything to do and gets bad results on every check he does make? Why weren’t they scared when the antagonist pulled a knife on them??”

            • BigSadDad@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              6 months ago

              Yeah, no you don’t get it.

              arguing with people, or playing a game I don’t like

              …yeah so if you’re the kind of player who argues and fights at the table. Maybe stick to structured games with clearly defined rules.

              People will propose bad rules, and we either argue or I suck it up

              Again, people do this when ‘friends’ want to just play a goofy made up game over some carbs

              Let’s use D&D for a game of political intrigue!

              Again…this isn’t your scenario. I don’t know what to tell you. You’re conflating taking game systems and adding other mechanics to it and just goofing around and making it up as you go.

              It’s okay to say “I need a game with explicit structure and rules”. That’s fine too, but maybe don’t argue with your players though.