• NSRXN@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
    13·
    6 个月前

    supply and demand is a theory about price discovery. it has no bearing on this discussion.

      • NSRXN@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
        12·
        6 个月前

        I don’t think that’s likely to happen. do you have another method that might be effective?

    • x00z@lemmy.worldEnglish
      3·
      6 个月前

      You’re claiming my choice has no impact, but it does because of supply and demand. It’s very small, but it’s still there.

      • NSRXN@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
        12·
        6 个月前

        this is just handwaiving. supply and demand isn’t a magic phrase that makes your actions have the desired effect.

        • x00z@lemmy.worldEnglish
          4·
          6 个月前

          That’s why I’m sharing the solution:

          Don’t contribute to the problem.

          If we don’t eat fish there would be close to no nets in the oceans.

            • x00z@lemmy.worldEnglish
              4·
              6 个月前

              Yeah because there’s too many people who are too stubborn to give it up.

              • NSRXN@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
                11·
                6 个月前

                regardless of the excuses you want to make for your plan’s ineffectiveness, I’m trying to find an effective solution

                • x00z@lemmy.worldEnglish
                  3·
                  6 个月前

                  Maybe you can get people to stop eating fish, so fishermen lose their job of destroying the sea.