• CaptainSpaceman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    So, the team … got efficiencies in the area of 33 to 34 percent. They also sent a sample to a European test lab, which came out with an efficiency of 33.7 percent. The researchers have a few ideas that should boost this to 35 percent, but didn’t attempt them for this paper. For comparison, the maximum efficiency for silicon alone is in the area of 27 percent, so that represents a very significant boost and is one of the highest perovskite/silicon combinations ever reported.

    Love this research and I hope solar eventually beats ICE engines for efficiency.

    However…

    The crystals were reasonably stable when simply exposed to light. But the combination of light and heat caused a more significant decay in performance. The researchers say that “devices maintain ≥90 percent of their initial performance up to 1,000 hours,” but a decay of up to 10 percent in about three months is not ready for commercial deployment. So, still some work to do there.

    • volodya_ilich@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      I hope solar eventually beats ICE engines for efficiency

      I’m not sure your comment makes a lot of sense. The problem with solar isn’t that it’s not as efficient as internal combustion engines, it’s that you can’t generate electricity on-demand. But it’s already a cheaper form of energy than burning fossil fuels in many countries.

    • Thrashy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Given that the first perovskites studied had lifespans that could be measured in minutes, this is great progress, but the fundamental problem is that as a class of materials they just don’t want to exist outside of an inert atmosphere. Without significant progress in stability and encapsulation materials, they’re more of a research curiosity than a viable real-world PV tech.

    • masterofn001@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      The differences in efficiency result in very different things.

      ICE - heat, smoke, carbon, pollution

      Solar -

    • scarabic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Even conventional solar panels work better when they are cool. Someone smart figured out that you can pump water through them and then use that hot water in your house. You get hot water while making your solar panels more productive. Of course they are crazy expensive.