Intel’s stock dropped around 30% overnight, shaving some $39 billion from the company’s market capitalization since rumors of a pending layoff first emerged. The devastating results come after the chip giant reported a loss for the second quarter, complained about yield issues with the Meteor Lake CPU, provided a modest business outlook for the next few quarters, and announced plans to lay off 15,000 people worldwide.

When the NYSE closed on July 31, Intel’s market capitalization was $130.86 billion. Then, a report about Intel’s massive layoffs was published, and the company’s market capitalization dropped sharply to $123.96 billion on August 1. Following Intel’s financial report yesterday, the company’s capitalization dropped to $91.86 billion. Essentially, Intel has lost half of its capitalization since January. As of now, Intel’s market value is a fraction of Nvidia’s worth and less than half of AMD’s.

As Intel’s actions look rather desperate, analysts believe that Intel’s challenges are existential. “Intel’s issues are now approaching the existential,” Stacy Rasgon, an analyst with Bernstein, told Reuters.

  • cygnus@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Brutal, nearly the lowest since 2008. Makes me want to buy in at this point.

    • bluGill@kbin.run
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      The market does tend to overreact so this is possible a sign to buy low. I can’t be bothered to check the fundamenals but it seems unlikely that amd is a better investment long term. If you are not looking at least 5 years to the future stocks are a bad idea.

      • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        AMD is super hot right now. Not in a good way.

        I bought AMD at $8/share (and am still holding it), and I’m getting a similar vibe from Intel now…

        • cygnus@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          I bought AMD at $8/share (and am still holding it)

          Wow, I’d have dropped that hot potato ages ago.

          • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            I am glad I didn’t lol. Still not, the datacenter GPUs are something else, and so is their multi-chip design prowess.

      • conditional_soup@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        OTOH: Boeing. Had the 737 Max bug been a one-off incredibly bad fuck up, they would have been a good buy. Then it turned out that that bug was just the first sign of many deep seated issues with their production process. Boeing 100% deserves everything they’re getting. Management skipped right over lawful, chaotic, and neutral evil and went into stupid evil, and decided that sacrificing QC/QA on aerospace equipment would be a great way to get returns for shareholders.

        • krashmo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          They didn’t skip those steps. The market just ignored the fact that they’ve been stepping through those options for the last 30 years because that’s what the market as a whole has been doing. As cliche and annoying as it sounds, this is exactly what late stage capitalism looks like. Once growth through sales becomes difficult, usually from approaching monopolistic size in a market, they only have two options left. They can either cut corners and headcount to save on operational expenses or they can decrease revenue growth. Considering the fact that the central thesis of our economy is the idea that infinite growth is not only possible but the only valid pursuit of any corporation it’s easy to guess what they’re going to do when faced with declining sales or any other detriment to growth.

        • trolololol@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Haha stupid evil

          I’ll use that any time I think about politicians as well. Trademark that fast mate

        • ✺roguetrick✺@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          And the frank truth is, if things heat up on the Taiwan straight, TSMC is toast and Samsung won’t be able to pick up the slack.

          • trolololol@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            It’s going to take 3d chess from China to put their hands in TSMC without US bringing in “democracy”. That factory is more strategic than oil.

            • ✺roguetrick✺@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 months ago

              It ain’t worth a nuclear war. Why do you think the feds are so focused on domestic manufacturing? The Arizona TSMC factory is just shipping workers from Taiwan it’s so dependent. I’d hate to see what the actual supply chain looks like.