I know I have small hands but c’mon. Flagship phones these days are strait up small tablets, not even what we’d have called on phablets 15 years ago.

I know it’s what people buy, but I’m still sad that if I want a phone that small then I have to deal with camera and display a couple gens old

  • orcrist@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 days ago

    Why would you buy a flagship phone? It sounds like you want not that. And not that exists.

    • PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 days ago

      Because, like I said in the post, flagship phones have the best cameras, and I take a lot of pictures

      Image sensor and optics quality drop off pretty quickly once you leave flagship territory.

    • KaRunChiy@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      14 days ago

      Yep, just bought one the other day and it was about 1/8th" shorter than my previous phone

    • PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 days ago

      The phone on the left is a pixel 7 pro.

      So, yes, by modern standards.
      But no, as you can see by the comparison to the phone next to it.
      And that’s kind of the point I’m making.

      • gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        13 days ago

        So, yes, by modern standards

        My wife’s P7 and my P8P are both roughly the same dimensions as an old landline handset would be (my phone is maybe half an inch thicker than the landline at my work)

        Cell phones of the 00’s were small by phone standards, modern phones are closer to old landline handset sizes than 00’s cells, so I’d say the 00’s cells are the ones off the standard

        • PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.caOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          13 days ago

          That’s pretty clearly not the grievance I was complaining about, I’m pretty sure you’re intentionally missing the point so that you can be contrary

    • Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      14 days ago

      the A series is smallish, the last small android phone was probably the Asus Zenfone 10, then Asus axed that line and merged the Zenfone line and ROG phone line and followed the ROG phones size. A phones however aren’t flagship so theyd fail the check.

    • mesamune@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      14 days ago

      6a is pretty good and will be supported for a bit. Wish they were more repairable though…

    • cm0002@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      14 days ago

      Yea the a series is supposed to be the small, cheap and good line

      The non-a but not the Pros are smaller, but “affordable flagship”

      Pro series are the big premium flagships or Foldy phones (until el Goog changes their mind (again) at least)

    • PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 days ago

      It is lol

      Know what’s even crazier? I’ve installed a launcher on my pixel 7 pro to give me a Windows phone homescreen.

      Fuck Microsoft, but those phones were banging. If only anyone made apps for them

  • kaidenshi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 days ago

    Unihertz specializes in small phones. They aren’t flagship spec but they are midrange at sensible prices. They also have keyboard phones and even a phone with a built in DMR radio for Amateur and GMRS use.

    Not a plug, I don’t even own one I just love that they are daring to be different.

    • L3ft_F13ld!@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      14 days ago

      Chinese company and the phones use Mediatek chips, so no custom ROM support last I checked. Otherwise I would have been all over it.

  • Paradachshund@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 days ago

    I have the same problem and my latest was an asus zenfone after a ton of research. Its been pretty solid actually.

    • morrowind@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 days ago

      Zenfone was heavily promoted as a “small” phone but its larger than the base galaxy, despite having a smaller display

    • PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 days ago

      Even that’s too big.

      That’s a pixel 7 pro on the left, which is only a little bigger than the 7a. I want something way smaller

  • cm0002@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 days ago

    I miss phones that experimented.

    I had the Motorola backflip (that was a fun one) and had one of the first phones with a fingerprint sensor that everyone said was a gimmick, had the one with the “indestructible screen” (Motorola Z2 force iirc) that I had a lot of fun throwing around till I broke it (But not the screen! I’ll give them that lmao), had every Nexus device until the bitter end (I cursed Google for a long time when they decided Pixels was the way forward, I didn’t pick up a pixel again until the Pixel Fold 0G) and so so many others over the years.

    Until one day they just stopped being cool for years, hell the Foldy phone has been the coolest innovation they’ve put out in years and we’re already back to nothing but iterations again

  • metaStatic@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 days ago

    We’re the kind of people that are pushing our phones to end of support, it’s not a market that moves product and thus not one the big companies listen to.

    I of course don’t miss small flagship phones because my S10e is still perfectly serviceable.

    My next phone will be e-ink at any size

    • tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      14 days ago

      S10e

      They can pry my 3.5 mm jack from my cold dead hands. Already got the battery replaced once.

      I’m gonna miss that swipe pad on the power button when it finally gives up the ghost.

  • whoisearth@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 days ago

    I have big hands and long fingers. I’m still waiting for phones to get big enough for me lol

    • Prandom_returns@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 days ago

      Oh, I feel you. I have been eyeballing iPad Mini as a phone, but can’t make myself buy an Apple product.

    • Empricorn@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 days ago

      I would vomit if I had to look at the Windows logo every time I pulled out my phone. Google is not perfect and they’ve made mistakes with Android, but at least it’s Open Source. Microsoft has a much worse record of opposing Open Source initiatives…

      • HappySkullsplitter@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        13 days ago

        This was nearly 20 years ago, Microsoft was annoying but fairly benign at the time. This phone with Windows Mobile 6 was released alongside the first release of android and the first iPhone

        • Empricorn@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          13 days ago

          You’re right, they haven’t been this overt since the 2000’s. But their flagship OS is still closed-source and forces ads and unpopular privacy violating features like Recall to this day…

  • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    14 days ago

    Flagship means the best of the best, of course it’s gonna be large and fancy lmfao.

    There’s plenty of phones that fit your niche, but it’s like expecting a cigar boat to be the flagship of the navy dude lol. Gotta temper yourself to realistic expectations, especially when the term “flagship” is thrown out.

      • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        13 days ago

        So you don’t want a flagship, you want a small compact phone with all the fixings. That would no longer be the flagship anymore by using established conventions.

        Flagship has specific meanings and you’re ignoring them to bitch and moan.

    • RedditWanderer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      14 days ago

      This makes no sense. Large doesn’t mean fancy. Back in the day, making the phone smaller was fancy.

      The minimal company’s flagship phone is a minimal phone. It’s their signature phone. The flagship was the ship that had the ranking officer/admiral on it, representing the fleet. Apple, google etc all decided their flagship phone would be huge.

      OP wants more flagship phones, that is the type of phone the company markets as its main phone, to be smaller. It has little to do with the best but how phones are used. So tell him “tough luck because most people use their phones as a TV so they will remain big”. It’s not because that’s a better phone.

      • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        14 days ago

        This makes no sense. Large doesn’t mean fancy. Back in the day, making the phone smaller was fancy.

        Which has nothing to do with the the historical term and already established convention of the term “flagship”, no one has ever called their compact phone a flagship, got any proof to back that asinine claim up?

        The minimal company’s flagship phone is a minimal phone. It’s their signature phone. The flagship was the ship that had the ranking officer/admiral on it, representing the fleet. Apple, google etc all decided their flagship phone would be huge.

        If it’s not the fanciest and most expensive, then by definition and original convention, it’s no longer a flagship phone.

        Terms have specific uses, let’s not dilute them to make ourselves feel better. Language IS fluid, but when people are obstinate to already preestablished conventions… a small phone will never by definition eve be considered a flagship, but bloviate if you want.

        • RedditWanderer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          14 days ago

          Terms have specific uses, let’s not dilute them to make ourselves feel better. Language IS fluid, but when people are obstinate to already preestablished conventions

          Ok there why didn’t you bother opening a dictionary or googling it.

          noun

          the ship in a fleet which carries the commanding admiral.

          the best or most important thing owned or produced by a particular organization.

          He’s just saying most phones companies (of all sizes) making are big phones. Get over yourself

          • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            14 days ago

            So the smallest and worst ship would be the flagship? That’s the defence? Lmfao because that makes total sense dude…. And how is that supposed to defend what a flagship is?

            How does that mean the smallest and most compact? As my original comment stated, that’s like claiming a cigar boat is the flagship, which no navy would do even if they were making smaller boats. Their largest and fanciest, would STILL be the flagship of the fleet….

            I “did read a dictionary”, which is maybe why I’m speaking? OP fucked up what a flagship is meant to be. Atleast I’m not the one making up new definitions to defend my asinine defence. How does the definition support your argument? It would STILL mean the best and most resourceful unit. Which wouldn’t be the smallest……

            the finest, largest, or most important one of a group of things (such as products, stores, etc.)  —often used before another noun

            Other definitions include “largest” why did you include the one that doesn’t…?

            is the lead ship in a fleet of vessels, typically the first, largest, fastest, most heavily armed, or best known.

            Which how is that the smallest and most compact…? That’s literally contradicting the established conventions dude lmfao. But again, bloviate about how you don’t understand language and want to make it what you want I guess…. Flagship has established conventions, and OP is asking for the opposite. Full stop.

            • RedditWanderer@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              14 days ago

              Each fleet has its flagship lol all companies have flagships. Yes the best phone of each company is their flagship. Flagship phones isn’t limited to some arbitrary sized companies.

              • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                13 days ago

                And no phone manufacturer has ever called their small phones their flagships, so for to OP to say they miss them, is them not actually knowing what the term is.

                Can you provide an example of a phone that fits OPs definition as being sold as a “flagship”? Because OPs arguing for something that’s never been done before.

                Flagships CAN be small, but it’s never been done in history before, still waiting for an example, I’ve asked twice now. Because OPs barking up the wrong tree. That’s the issue here.

                You’re making this argument, while not providing anything to support it, I’ve even asked for a source to prove your point, all you’ve done is provide a definition that i then provided multiple that directly contradict the one you provided.

                Flagship phones isn’t limited to some arbitrary sized companies.

                In the history of the term, it’s never been a cigar boat dude…. It’s always the largest and fanciest, not the smallest and fanciest. Prove it dude. Step up or fuck off.

              • PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.caOP
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                13 days ago

                He is wrong.

                I’m asking for small flagships.
                They used to make small flagships.

                Flagship doesn’t mean biggest, it means best.

                If settle for a small non-flagship phone with a flagship camera pod and display tech. But they don’t make those either.

                • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  13 days ago

                  They used to make small flagships.

                  When??? You keep saying that, but flagships have always been large and fancy and never small and fancy. Can you provide an example? Because what it seems from every explanation you’ve made in this thread, you just don’t know what the term flagship means…

                  Sounds like you just need to learn words properly, the only one wrong here is you using an established term incorrectly and are conflating a small phone as a “flagship” which has NEVER been the case. Please provide an example of a flagship being small and compact, I would love to see how you came to fuck this well established term up so horrendously.

              • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                13 days ago

                Does “fit in your hand” not mean small and compact?

                I’m not the one using the term flagship to mean a non flagship phone. You’re trying to change established definitions and conventions.

                You want a fancy small phone, no phone manufacturer has ever called a phone that fits that description as a “flagship” so to say you miss the. Is just straight up bullshit and you being an idiot and not using established definitions correctly.

                • PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.caOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  13 days ago

                  Not only is that laughably not true

                  But even if it was true, it wouldn’t mean anything because being a flagship phone isn’t about size, it’s about showing off your tech.

                  But like I said, I don’t have to get hypothetical, because phones this big weren’t considered flagships in the past, they were considered “notes” and “tabs”

          • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            14 days ago

            More specifically, it’s typically the vessel the admiral commands from, not just their one he happens to be on.

  • nafri@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 days ago

    consumers in general wants bigger phone, market follow along

    sadly, small phone is a niche now

    • morrowind@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 days ago

      There’s more to it than that. Big phones are more marketable and have better profit margins. It’s not all consumer preference. Kinda similar to cars actually