• surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    17 days ago

    Decades ago…

    “Why do I need electricity? I have candles. Lights seem excessive.”

    Yes, but once most people have electricity, new products will be designed to take advantage of it. Now you can have a washing machine, for example.

    Broadband is the same. Once most of your population has high bandwidth, we can start to design things that will use it. Right now we’re still designing for DSL speeds.

    • frezik@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      17 days ago

      That’s entirely speculative. There are diminishing returns. Unless you’re going to host your own YouTube, the use case for 50Gbps connections to the home is quite small. 4K video streaming at Ultra HD Blu-ray bitrates doesn’t even come close to saturating 1Gbps, and all streaming services compress 4K video significantly more than what Ultra HD Blu-ray offers. The server side is the limit, not home connections.

      Now, if you want to talk about self-hosting stuff and returning the Internet to a more peer-to-peer architecture, then you need IPv6. Having any kind of NAT in the way is not going to work. Connection speed still isn’t that important.

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        15 days ago

        Take a look at devContainers as an idea that might be generalized. It’s just docker containers so so big but not huge however the use case ….

        devContainers are a complete portable development environment, with support from major IDEs. Let’s say I want to work on a Java service. I open my IDE, it pulls the latest Java devContainer with my environment and all my tools, fetches the latest from git, and I’m ready to go. The problem with this use case is I’m waiting this whole time. I don’t want to sit around for a minute or two every time I want to edit a program. The latest copy needs to be here, now, as I open my IDE

      • Opisek@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        17 days ago

        How exactly does NAT prevent that? On good hardware it adds insignificant latency.

        • frezik@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          17 days ago

          It has nothing to do with latency, and everything to do with not being able to directly address things behind NAT.

      • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        16 days ago

        Unless you’re going to host your own YouTube…

        This is exactly what peer tube is struggling with. This bandwidth would solve the video federation problem.

        See, you get it!

        • frezik@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          16 days ago

          Except we need IPv6 before that’s at all viable.

          We are not even filling out the bandwidth of pipes we have to the home right now. “If you build it, they will come” does not apply when there’s already something there that isn’t being fully utilized.

      • reksas@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        16 days ago

        there could be some new thing that no one has not even bothered to think about because of the limitations. Imagine streaming back when downloading few kilobytes for an hours was considered reasonable, people would have laughed at the very thought of it.

    • Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      17 days ago

      So I’m just going to be a completely different person once I have access to these speeds or you are suggesting new tech that will be made available to consumers?

      • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        16 days ago

        The second one.

        Think back to when you were on dial-up. The concept of a streaming movie service would have been a fantasyland. No one was creating one. The infrastructure wasn’t there. It was impossible.

        As soon as people started getting broadband, and enough people got it, streaming services could exist.

        Are you different? No, you just want to watch a movie. But now you don’t have to go to Blockbuster.