We all know Signal, Matrix, Telegram, SimpleX, etc… But if you can’t access the internet you can’t communicate. Pretty logic. But would it be possible, at least theoretically, to create an app that permits to message people even if the internet goes down?

It might be a dumb question I really have no idea to be honest.

  • Mr. Zeus@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    24 days ago

    scratch telegram off that list, but Session messenger there instead.

    Telegram isn’t private, one guy has the master key to the whole thing

    • Ju135@lemmings.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      23 days ago

      Yeah to be honest I don’t even know how telegram became so popular in the “privacy-oriented world”

  • Gayhitler@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    22 days ago

    It’s not p2p but at least many years ago:

    SMS.

    If the Internet outage is local then the towers would still work and you’d be able to get texts. I went through a few storms where wired home internet was down, the towers weren’t giving me a data connection (no mobile web browsing or anything), but I was able to send and receive texts.

    If you really care about what you’re asking after, do what someone else said and get a radio license. It’s 150 year old technology and every time something happens radio operators pop up some kind of emergency communications or bridge to the internet through repeaters or something.

  • bad_news@lemmy.billiam.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    24 days ago

    There used to be one years ago that used WiFi radios or Bluetooth or whatever so you could chat to people near you… I totally forget what it was called though.

  • QuazarOmega@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    24 days ago

    Besides the already mentioned Briar, there’s Berty, can’t speak to its quality since I never used it, but I always found the project neat in and of itself

    • Ju135@lemmings.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      23 days ago

      I found Berty yesterday just after making this post. But as a neophyte in cryptography and everything, how am I supposed to know which one is better for my privacy ? (e.g. between Briar and Berty) Because right now the only thing that I have is what the apps are “telling” me so… Yeah I don’t know how to chose.

      • QuazarOmega@lemy.lol
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        22 days ago

        Honestly if you don’t want to think too much about it, go with Briar, it’s way more battle tested, while Berty seems like it hasn’t seen much adoption since it’s younger, both have a bit of development activity I saw, so I can’t say if one is more or less maintained than the other

        As for the actual question of gauging which has the better cryptographical implementation, I don’t know either, beside the most surface level information I know very little.
        I believe if you want to look into it, you’ll have to start from their whitepapers

    • Mr. Zeus@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      24 days ago

      wouldn’t a cheap walkie-talkie be more practical in that situation?

      That’s not secure or encrypted

      • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        24 days ago

        You can encrypt a radio.

        Rattlegram is an app on iOS/Android that alllows converting text to audio and play it over your phone’s speaker

        Secure Space Encryptor (SSE) (known as Paranoia Text Encryption on iOS) is an Open Source app that can encrypt text.

        1. Use SSE to encrypt text
        2. Copy-Paste the Ciphertext to Rattlegram
        3. Sent it over the radio
        4. On the other end, use Raddlegram to turn the audio back to the ciphertext
        5. Use SSE to decrypt.

        Voila! Off-Grid Encrypted communications.

        Warning: Encryption over radio is illegal in many countries 😉 (but fuck the law lol, who cares)

        • Mr. Zeus@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          23 days ago

          You can encrypt a radio.

          Yes, but that requires you and the one(s) you’re communicating with to mod some radios and then to keep those radios secret, which won’t be easy once you start using them, especially in a situation like that where the government would probably be scanning those frequencies for exactly that

  • Mr. Zeus@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    24 days ago

    yes, a lot of people were using those kinds of apps during the free hong kong protests, they go from device-to-device with no internet in between.

    No idea what the app is called, but apps like those exist

  • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    23 days ago

    Telegram isn’t P2P and isn’t recommended. Signal is good, but not P2P. Matrix is decentralized, not P2P. SimpleX is P2P, I think, but not sure.