Greetings!

A friend of mine wants to be more secure and private in light of recent events in the USA.

They originally told me they were going to use telegram, in which I explained how Telegram is considered compromised, and Signal is far more secure to use.

But they want more detailed explanations then what I provided verbally. Please help me explain things better to them! ✨

I am going to forward this thread to them, so they can see all your responses! And if you can, please cite!

Thank you! ✨

  • Stomata@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 days ago

    Telegram is not end to end encrypted. Repeating it’s not. Only private mode or something like that is.

    • Dyskolos@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      You don’t say? A cloud-service I can access from all devices plus API and bots is not e2e-encrypted with zero knowledge? I’m shocked. That’s what “secret chat” is for. Literally.

      They chose this way as the regular Joe and Jane don’t care for privacy but for comfort. You can never ever have both. Nowhere.

      I love tgram for it being so open. And e2e when I need it. I don’t need privacy for when my smarthome sends me notifications about a light I left on or something 😁

      • Cysioland@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        22 hours ago

        WhatsApp is E2EE and it does maintain some of the “cloud” functionality, at the expense of the device transfers being a pain and potentially you losing your message history if you don’t have a backup.

        • Dyskolos@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          58 minutes ago

          Despite being us-american and from Zuckerberg, it’s an incredibly horrible app. I would not touch this shit with a 10m-pole. It might be e2e, but can I verify this in the source? Oh right.

      • Boomkop3@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yep, and this allows for proper content moderation. Telegram can actually just find and report creeps to authorities

        • Dyskolos@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          That too. Sadly the restrictiveness was badly abused. Noone really wonders but…that’s why we can’t have nice things.

            • Dyskolos@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              I meant the restrictiveness towards governments. The pesos and Nazis fucked that up, tgram had to do something or have their ill repute grow even more.

              • Boomkop3@reddthat.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 day ago

                Telegram seems to be a popular option for groups of such orgs. Other apps have the same risks tho. It’s a bit if a mess

                • Dyskolos@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  56 minutes ago

                  I actually always deemed that a quality aspect. If those shitbags use tgram it has a reason. Sadly it’s not really great for the app itself. So he had to do something about it. IMHO the best compromise he could do other than just staying “the bad guy”.