And has this guy never seen a chorse before?
(Okay, I got nothing after that one. Based on my limited knowledge of French, this is appears to be a terrible translation issue- tree = arbre, horse = cheval, house = maison.)
And has this guy never seen a chorse before?
(Okay, I got nothing after that one. Based on my limited knowledge of French, this is appears to be a terrible translation issue- tree = arbre, horse = cheval, house = maison.)
I think that it’s just a screenshot of on-screen translation (like Google Lens or whatever, you can def see the artefacts) of this:
(Caption is, naturally, compete bullshit)
ok but how did google translate go from Yacht to Yote??? what is a Yote???
Past tense of Yeet.
Yeet, yote, yut
Yotten in British English.
Might even be AI translated, as the font is whack
(Arent all translators “AI” for a decade+ now?)
What I meant was AI image manipulation, as in uploading the image to chatGPT and saying “give me this image with english text”
It’s called augmented reality, thats how image translators work.
It’s instant, eg Lens:
Before I zoomed in on the picture, my first thought is the letters supposed to represent their respective objects could have been in French words. A for arbre, b for balloon, and c for cheval.
Yup, the OOP is really just milking for social media likes by faking the post.
Yes, I had that thought too - as a learning tool/exercise for kids perhaps, but the use value would have been weird (in the sense that usually they well tell you to ‘only speak that language’ when you are learning it).
They used white out and then wrote the translated words in. It’s obvious when you zoom in.
The pictures have the same kind of artifacts though. This is AI upscaled at the very least.
Thats how translators & augmented reality works.
Picture translators add text boxes in another language on top of recognized text. They don’t contain such artifacts and can be rendered at any resolution. These artifacts will only appear if output from a picture translator is processed further.