• aesthelete@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Now we’re doing headlines like this with tech companies in addition to politicians? These fuckers act with impunity because they can.

    For some reason, it appears the unbreakable barrier for humanity is switching the fucking social media site you go to.

    What would it take for people to consider not looking at Instagram and Facebook? A feed full of snuff videos?

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      the unbreakable barrier for humanity is switching the fucking social media site you go to.

      Facebook is quickly becoming a retirement community, exclusively for me-maws and pepes. It hasn’t been the tool for college kids to organize keggers in nearly a decade.

      But when alternatives to Facebook crop up - your Instagrams and TikToks and Discords and WhatsApps and Grindrs - they don’t last long before being gobbled up by the bigger social media giants or shut down by hostile state regulators.

      In the end, everything returns to Facebook, because the big companies can borrow money for free and staple on whatever small firm is seeing a lot of early growth. I give BlueSky another three years, tops, before one of the big social media giants acquires it.

      • aesthelete@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        I agree, but we should at least have them fork over the cash to buy a new dumpster to enshittify every few years. There’s Twitter that people still cling to despite it being a superfund site since at least when Leon bought it.

        Make Facebook the next MySpace, make Reddit the next Digg. Make social media sites starve to death from lack of engagement again.

      • SolaceFiend@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Instagram and TikTok are already big social media giants in their own right.

        If TikTok gets gobbled up, it’ll be because of the legal proceedings going on in which lawmakers are trying to force TikTok to allow itself to be bought up by some US company. Which is another issue altogether, cause if I start a business, the legality of the US government forcing me to sell my business to someone else, or even to be forced to sell my business to a foreign government or company and not be allowed to possess it, is a whole can of worms.

        But outside of WhatsApp being shut down due to security reasons, the majority of those wouldn’t qualify as social media sites that would be gobbled up by some other social media giant.

        • Kichae@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          Instagram is, uh, Meta? It was gobbled up just as it was taking off.

          Tiktok couldn’t be gobbled, and is being beat down by legislators until they sell to US tech firms.

  • BlackLaZoR@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    announced content moderation changes that will allow users to say that LGBTQ+ people have “mental illness,”

    Someone gets triggered by free speech here.

    Anyway, wind blows the other way now. Zuck doesn’t want to piss against it

  • Soup@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Man they’re not even doing the dog-whistle thing anymore, huh? Fucking disgusting, I hope he experiences the everlasting warmth of a car fire in the near future.

  • apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Major props to those causing a ruckous internally there. That said, they likely fully expected a backlash and likely didn’t care. Anyone who cares can be replaced by another sycophant, at a reduced salary even.

  • misk@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Meta was already enabling genocide in third world countries and countless other things but this is what caused chaos. Weird priorities, huh?

    • deathbird@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Not like they’re a bunch of committed leftists working there.

      Which is more likely to impact a Meta employee personally?

    • mke@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      In fairness, do we know for certain what happened in Facebook back then? Maybe some employees did protest, maybe they’re the same people protesting now, even. Or they quit. Thing is, LGBT issues make engaging articles. Third world suffering? Eh, it depends.

      Yet, I agree with the overall point because this is the crux of the matter: on average, one of these simply matters more—one way or another, see transphobes cheering—for people of this subgroup. This is us.

      The usual notes apply: good on them for protesting, big media isn’t helping, fully ethical employment is like fully ethical consumption.

      • spujb@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        id say a good 80% of those downvotes are misunderstanding. something about the wording? idk. i thought they were talking about progressive folks getting outraged at first, not meta employees specifically. almost downvoted but caught my misunderstanding in time

    • Gordito@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Ah yes, the “old news theory”…

      -They’ve done it already, why call them out again? It’s old news.

      While they escalate and continue to go full-on hate for profit.

      • spujb@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        i was with you at first but upon rethinking i do think it’s fair to note that there was little to no internal uproar in meta over the myanmar and othe situations. of course there was uproar outside meta. when they said “weird priorities” they meant from meta employees specifically—not progressive or leftist voices in general.

        hope me describing my train of thoughts helps :)

      • morrowind@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago
        1. They haven’t done “it” because it’s a different thing
        2. OP did not say not to call it out again, simply ask us to consider why this thing caused more chaos than others
    • floofloof@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Still, it’s good to see there are people there who won’t just go along with anything.

  • merde alors@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    i think I’ve finally reached peak zuckerberg, i don’t want to read one more thing about facebook or meta or whatever

  • Rhoeri@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Five people interviewed….

    “It’s total chaos!!!”

    I despise Facebook as much as the next person, but sensationalism hurts more than it helps.

    • Empricorn@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      “Internal conversations and five people interviewed.”

      Let’s be honest. For current employees, it’s probably 10-100 times that. If my company did something controversial and then the press asked me for a reaction, I’d say “no comment” like it’s my catch phrase. Unless you already have a job lined up (that can’t be undone by “badmouthing your employer”), no one’s being open and truthful.

  • 1luv8008135@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Gee I wonder why he’s suddenly decided to start moving parts of the business to Texas… little Musk-ette over here…

    All of this is very likely to kiss the ring of Herr Trump

      • Empricorn@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        “Rational”!? No, that’s false. Though it might be reasonable for someone who works for a living. But the only thing they are risking is their “high score”, nothing else. Literally nothing a billionaire does is rational, and that goes for every single one of them. I feel like we all constantly forget how much $1 billion is. https://mkorostoff.github.io/1-pixel-wealth/ These people have several or hundreds of times that! Don’t forget they didn’t actually earn it. Plus, it’s still not enough. They choose to spend their time “working” and influencing governments instead of spending time with family. Power and money, they can never have enough…

        Can you imagine your generational line’s entire lives being paid for before they’re even born plus the ability to literally solve suffering in society. Homelessness? Malnourishment? Drought? Hunger? The amount of wealth they sit on could literally solve any problem, anywhere in the world with a signed check and it wouldn’t even affect their day-to-day life at all. They just choose not to. I can’t imagine it. That’s what’s wrong with billionaires and why they’re not rational at all…

          • Empricorn@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            But I’m not. To distill my rambling: it’s not rational to feel the need to “cozy up to an incoming fascist dictator.” Because billionaires simply don’t have needs. Housing, healthcare, education, food, security, it’s all paid for, for the next 100 generations. That was my point.

            The parts about morality were 100% me ranting…

            • RedditRefugee69@lemmynsfw.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              8 months ago

              Who’s making the argument that cozying up with a dictator makes the difference between them being able to meet their lowest Mazlow needs?

              • Empricorn@feddit.nl
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                8 months ago

                I’m not familiar with that term. I thought we were discussing why it’s rational?

                • blazeknave@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  A) then look it up; concept or vocabulary, doesn’t matter, Google it before saying it’s whataboutism. The point was salient.

                  B) self preservation is rational.

                  C) parasites kill to survive in nature.

                  D) something sucking for an observer, doesn’t make the observed’s rationale illogical.

      • takeda@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago
        • Facebook/Instagram/Whatsapp/Oculus
        • Amazon
        • Apple
        • OpenAI
        • Google

        I am surprised myself, but making progress of not using their products. For example did not buy any gift via Amazon this Christmas.

    • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Anyone ‘decent’ there is a wage-slave that doesn’t have an out. If you can leave meta and don’t there’s no decency there.

  • stealth_cookies@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Its amazing how quickly these assholes have dropped any sort of facade they were keeping up towards their public image. At best they are doing whatever they think will get them the most money, more realistically they actually support this regressive bullshit. As a non-American I am so pissed at what a good portion of that country has voted for and those that stayed home instead of preventing this.

    • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      The oligarchs have paid their tithe to king Trump and feel like they are immune to consequences. So far they have been correct.

    • leftytighty@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Supposing your team had won, these people would go back to only paying lip service. Better, no doubt, but not a solution. How long did fascists and racists and misogynists lay dormant in US culture before seizing control now?

      You need cleansing and systemic change. People need to internalize “no one is free until everyone is free.” Fascists and ethno-nationalists need to be afraid and culturally eliminated over generations.

      Fascism is enabled by liberalism, and its capitalist ideology, and it’s promoted by capitalists when capital is threatened. Capitalism is the underlying force here, and capitalists are behaving in exactly the same way they’ve done at similar points in history and as described and predicted by leftists.

      Yes Democrats losing the vote sucks and we’re all paying for it, globally, but their win would have been a delay at best. That doesn’t mean winning votes isn’t important, but it means that it can’t be your one and only political action once every 4 years. It’s time to get serious.

    • yarr@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      LOL welcome to corporate America. The only reason they paid lip service to causes like you mention is because it was temporarily a pathway to more profit. Now that Trump is in office (or nearly so, anyway) they have read the room and realized these beliefs are actually a liability now. So, surprise! They dropped em like a rock in the pursuit of more profits. Never never never trust a corporation to do the right thing. They sometimes accidentally do it in the pursuit of profits, but tying your hopes and dreams to a large corporation is a foolish plan. THEY DO NOT CARE ABOUT YOU THEY CARE ABOUT THE MONEY IN YOUR WALLET.

      • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        The “it’s a private company lolz” thing was itself a reaction to when Republicans were refusing to make gay wedding cakes, and the loss of the Fairness Doctrine long before that.

      • leftytighty@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        I think “thought it was a great idea to hand over the power […] to private companies” is a misrepresentation. Some moderation was better than no moderation, but obviously "the political left"would have preferred regulation rather than self regulation.

        What’s the point you’re making? That nothing should have been done?

      • ubergeek@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        I mean, I feel thats still true. And because it’s true, we need to get the f off of it, as a society.

    • TheFriar@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Yeah, it is absolutely crazy how much the tide has shifted with trump’s reelection. These so-called “woke” companies (it was always performative, but they performed for the more just side) have all turned 180 and dropped to their knees to kiss the ring.

      And this is because of the very real feeling that trump will abuse his power and unconstitutionally stay in office. The guardrails seem to have come down, and these fuckers are rushing to get on the fascist’s good side.

      That should alarm everyone, so I’ll say it again: these companies are positioning themselves on the side of fascism because they don’t think we can stop them anymore. They are making business decisions that bolster fascists because there’s a fuckin dollar in it.

      With the power of these fucking megacorps behind the fascist movement, it’s like sticking a rocket engine on its ass.

      • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        The guardrails seem to have come down

        They don’t seem to, they definitely have. Remember that Supreme Court ruling that said the president can break the law?

  • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    LMAO, employees are about to find out why a union would be a good idea. Gotta speedrun growing class consciousness.