• cley_faye@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    If you consider debugging broken LLM-generated code to be a skill… sure, go for it. But, since generated code is able to use tons of unknown side effects and other seemingly (for humans) random stuff to achieve its goal, I’d rather take the other approach, where it takes a human half an hour to write the code that some LLM could generate in seconds, and not have to learn how to parse random mumbo jumbo from a machine, while getting a working result.

    Writing code is far from being the longest part of the job; and you gingerly decided that making the tedious part even more tedious is a great idea to shorten the already short part of it…

    • brie@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      It’s similar to fixing code written by interns. Why hire interns at all, eh?

      Is it faster to generate then debug or write everything? Needs to be properly tested. At the very least many devs have the perception of being faster, and perception sells.

      It actually makes writing web apps less tedious. The longest part of a dev job is pretending to work actually, but that’s no different from any office jerb.