• daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    I’m not American. But I’ll give a clear example about my country.

    In Spain people used to migrate to Latin American. As life was better there. It was only until the 70… That the trend changed. We became a democracy and started fighting for working rights. And that worked. We made our country a better place. And people starting coming more and more snd more and now they are coming in mass.

    From this 40 years where migrational policies changed. And Spain moved from beeing poorer that Latin American to richer. We did not colonize anything, we didn’t use slaves, became s colonial power, invaded any other country or organizing any coup in any place, we did not divide Africa or done anything bad. Countries can get better without exploiting others. We got better by fighting for worker rights and making this place one of the places with more worker security in the world. That made us richer, that made us a place desirable for inmigration. I shall not accept negation of the worker struggle, and the worker sacrifices that achieved this by any identity-policy propaganda, where people are based or good based on their skin tone or the country they were born in. We achieved what we got without exploiting others. The FMI tried to destroy us as well and we managed to overcome it with socialist politics. We must now defend what we achieved, were are entitled to it, as we fought a lot for it.

      • daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        Ah yeah, the spanish empire from many centuries ago. Whose colonies are full from spanish inmigrants because latin America was richer than mainland Spain. You know that you are talking about something similar to the relationship between UK and the US/Canada don’t you? Old time colonies that got, in fact, richer that the mainland country. Is the US exploited by the UK? Is the US poverty fault of the British empire?

        You don’t know anything. You have a dogma.

        Do a research on Spanish inmigration please.

        And don’t go to fucking 15th century.

        Go to 1800s 1900s. Search for the “gallegos”, search for “hacer las americas”.

        Spain has been a very poor country for many many years, until very recently.

        • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          5 days ago

          Your empire didn’t end until 1976.

          And absolutely none of this has anything to do with the fact that stopping people from migrating will do nothing to fix poverty.

          You call yourself a leftist and you have no concept of how imperialism shapes our world.

          • daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            5 days ago

            You are looking terribly wrong by anyone who knows anything about Spanish history right now 😂

            The great Spanish empire of 1975😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

            Really. You are doing yourself a bad favour writing such irrational things.

            Left is supposed to be rational, please.

            Be rational! Think about what you are writing!

            You are being incredible insensible and offensive to the poor Spanish workers that had to eat street cats in the 1950s because they were starving to death. But according to some Lemmytor they were a colonial imperialist superpower.

            • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              5 days ago

              Nobody said imperial powers were immune to poverty. They thrive off of it, that’s where they get their soldiers. Like what, I’m supposed to ignore US imperialism because of the vast poverty that exists in that country?

              Either way that doesn’t mean you get to turn away the people who were made poor by imperialism and tell them to fix their own country, regardless of how much you personally benefited.

              It isn’t fucking relevant that you’re not in a wealthy country. In fact it makes it harder to understand why you’ve got no compassion for anyone else. Immigration doesn’t hurt you personally.

              Someone has taken you in with faux-leftist reactionary rhetoric, but it’s clear you don’t care to learn the reality, so I don’t see much point in carrying on talking to you.

              • daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                5 days ago

                I don’t care about the US. I’m not talking about the US.

                I’m talking about my country. The US is not the whole world.

                Mass inmigration have some negative impact to some workers. To all, bad impact workers on the origin country, on the destination country and for the migrant workers. Mass inmigration only helps capitalists, that’s why they defend it the most. That’s why the most capitalist country in the world (now I am indeed talking about the US) is incredibly open to immigrants. Massive immigration is great to increase shareholders profits. Not so good for everybody else, including migrants.

                But if you somehow think that Spain was a imperialistic colonial superpower by 1975 is a waste of time trying to explain it. Talking about it rationally is against your dogma, your identity politics, and the anti-worker pseudoleft, so… No point.