You must log in or register to comment.
42
Well, that’s just not fair. That’s the answer to everything. I wanted the answer for something specific
Sorry, I don’t make the rules.
That’s life mate.
There are an infinite number of solutions, 42 is in at least one of them
Can you write it properly?
I’m confused by your reply because the only variable in that equation is
yAls long as you don’t define
eas the Eulerian number,eis to be treated as a variable.Yea, but
eis almost never used as a variable because it is always assumed to be Euler’s number outside really specific contexts and it’d be bizarre to see it given as a variable without a,b,c, and d.One important thing in anything math related is to be precise and do not leave room for speculation. Sure in math context
eis almost always preserved forexp(1), but it is either is stated explicitly or is obvious from the context. Here is no context.
Are there two variables, y and e? What are we even supposed to solve for? There’s some context missing
7y(12e+11) - 85 = 2y +12e
(7(12e+11)-2)y = 12e + 85
y = (12e + 85)/(7(12e+11)-2)
y = (12e + 85)/(84e+77-2)
y = (12e + 85)/(84e+75)
Assuming e = exp(1) ≈ 2.73, my calculator says that y ≈ 0.3878, or a little over a third.
