• Rose@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    25 days ago

    If Ukraine were to surrender territory, they would have to be allowed into NATO, to be secured from repeat attack from Russia.

    I do think that’s one of the more realistic scenarios expected under Trump, though I’m not sure about it having to rest specifically on NATO and not some other written security guarantees. However, in that scenario, Russia gets to keep its gains and the world returns to business as usual, as we saw after Russia’s actions in Moldova, Georgia, Syria, Ukraine in 2014, etc (and that’s just the military involvement, not to mention the countless influence and infiltration campaigns, isolated sabotage and killings in Europe, among other things). It could stop Russia from moving forward in Ukraine, but it wouldn’t stop Russia from choosing another target as it always has.

    • Buffalox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      24 days ago

      and not some other written security guarantees.

      Ukraine was already guaranteed that Russia wouldn’t attack them, when they gave up their nuclear weapons to Russia in the 90’s. Something similar will not fly again.

      • Rose@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        24 days ago

        I agree, but the part about not caring if it’s NATO is something Zelensky said himself.