jeffw@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 months agoAI's Future Hangs in the Balance With California Lawgizmodo.comexternal-linkmessage-square69fedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down10
arrow-up10arrow-down1external-linkAI's Future Hangs in the Balance With California Lawgizmodo.comjeffw@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 months agomessage-square69fedilink
minus-squaredaniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·3 months agoDoes that apply to any other type of technology, or are they just witch hunting?
minus-squareNeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·3 months ago any other type of technology Are there, for example, nuclear weapons available for general use?
minus-squaredaniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·edit-23 months agoWhat kind of straw-man fallacy is that? Please be rational. Nuclear power keeps lots of people lights on. Same a AI technology is already making lots of people live better. For instance, in my country the IRS equivalent is already using it to successfully detect fiscal fraud.
minus-squaremriormro@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·3 months agoThat’s not a straw man. Nuclear technology is highly regulated.
minus-squaredaniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·edit-23 months agoI do not know how regulations come into play. But I’m OK with regulating technology according to its potential (real, not imagined) risk. What I’m not OK with is with primitivism.
Does that apply to any other type of technology, or are they just witch hunting?
Are there, for example, nuclear weapons available for general use?
What kind of straw-man fallacy is that?
Please be rational.
Nuclear power keeps lots of people lights on. Same a AI technology is already making lots of people live better. For instance, in my country the IRS equivalent is already using it to successfully detect fiscal fraud.
That’s not a straw man. Nuclear technology is highly regulated.
I do not know how regulations come into play. But I’m OK with regulating technology according to its potential (real, not imagined) risk.
What I’m not OK with is with primitivism.