• ulterno@lemmy.kde.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    I don’t get it.
    Are you replying to “Except fun fact…no.” - u/Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
    Or to my reply to it, that implies, maybe their renderer is non-standard and causing the backslashes to not work.

    \>\>:| --> >>:| works pretty well for me.

    • NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      this is a whole mess of confusion and miscommunication that probably absolutely no one cares about, and I for one am happy to just watch

      • ulterno@lemmy.kde.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        I see, so the confusion is about whether u/Pyro@Programming.dev intended the double eyebrow or they made a mistake with that and are being corrected for it.

        I thought they wanted the double eyebrow, because why would you put 2 if you only wanted one? And if you wanted the “quote” option, you would just not escape the leftmost “>”.


        In case my above words are more confusing, Yes, it shows up as 2 sets of eyebrows for me too.
        I thought that’s what the Thread Starter wanted.

        CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

        • Gestrid@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          No, they were trying to make only one set of eyebrows appear. They tried fixing it by using two sets, thinking using one as a quote would make the other appear as a set of eyebrows. Instead, they got two quotes.

          Also, you type usernames on Lemmy like this: @Pyro@programming.dev.